• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The European Parliament is taking even more drastic measures than the DOJ to prevent terrorist attacks.

Europe Passes Snoop Measure

12:26 p.m. May 30, 2002 PDT

The European Parliament passed a controversial measure Thursday that would allow countries to force telecommunication companies to keep detailed records of customers' data for snooping purposes.

The Parliament passed the Communications Data Protection Directive, 351 to 133, despite an aggressive campaign by civil liberties groups who say the measure would enable police to spy on citizens.

Parliament members who voted for the directive say police need to access transmission data for e-mail, phone calls, Internet use, faxes, and pager messages to deter terrorist attacks. The directive would permit authorities to direct telecom companies to store such data for indefinite time periods.

The directive now faces approval by the 15 European Union member countries. Civil liberty groups have vowed to continue fighting it at a national level.

But it is unclear how the directive would be enacted in countries such as Spain, where its constitution guarantees "secrecy" of private communications and police must obtain a court order to access such data, Socialist Senator Félix Lavilla Martínez said.

If the directive is endorsed by the Spanish Parliament, the "Spanish socialists will make an effort to maximize the constitutional guarantees," he added.

Generally, European law takes precedence in cases where a directive conflicts with national laws, even if it means revising a country's constitution, said Cedric Laurant, a Belgian attorney and policy analyst at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).

The legislation was watered down somewhat at the last minute by the inclusion of text indicating that data retention must constitute a "necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security" and that it must be done in accordance with the tenets of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Nevertheless, one member of parliament issued a harsh statement following the directive's approval Thursday:

"With the vote of today, the directive on privacy in electronic communications can be correctly defined as the directive of data retention and hyper-regulation of the Internet," Italian legislator Marco Cappato said in a statement. An amendment introduced by Cappato to delete the data retention clause from the directive, which is part of a larger telecommunications law, was voted down on Thursday.

It often takes up to five years for member countries to implement directives.
 
thats complete crap that EU law take precedence over national laws. A very good example why we should be VERY careful signing worldwide treaties and agreements. We should NEVER let a multinational institution dictate how this country is run.
 
Well Europe has never done very well at maintaining peace and prosperity when they have been seperated and soveriegn nations. With the increasing global dominance of America and the continuing rise of Asia the European Union and the centralized government and policy that it allows is in my opinion neccessary for Europe to have any voice in world affairs and in the world economy in the future. Strength in numbers and all that.
 
Originally posted by: Lucky
thats complete crap that EU law take precedence over national laws. A very good example why we should be VERY careful signing worldwide treaties and agreements. We should NEVER let a multinational institution dictate how this country is run.

This has nothing to do with worldwide treaties and agreements, as the EU is striving towards one government for all EU countries. It's like saying every US state should have it's own government and should not abide to the rules of the US government.

The EU also just forbid all spam mail and SMS except Opt-in stuff btw. Not that this will have any effect.
 
Back
Top