- Jun 24, 2004
- 15,628
- 5
- 81
I don't know how much national press this has been getting, but I heard about it on NPR and did a little more research. Quick run-down here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...nate_leadership_crisis
So anyway, all I can tell is basically we've got 62 state senators all unwilling to budge and allow the other party to "take control" of the senate. There is no Lieutenant Governor because of Eliot Spitzer's resignation, so there is no President of the Senate to break the tie. And now we have members of each party whining and crying like little babies that the other side is at fault for the whole fiasco.
But yeah, it seems as though any one of the members of the senate could bring the whole thing to an end immediately (at the expense of their own party of course). Maybe I don't understand the whole thing, but that's what it seems like to be. As I indicated in the thread title, I think they should dump every single member of the senate since they're all responsible for the fiasco and they're all guilty of abandoning their duties to their constituents.
So anyway, all I can tell is basically we've got 62 state senators all unwilling to budge and allow the other party to "take control" of the senate. There is no Lieutenant Governor because of Eliot Spitzer's resignation, so there is no President of the Senate to break the tie. And now we have members of each party whining and crying like little babies that the other side is at fault for the whole fiasco.
But yeah, it seems as though any one of the members of the senate could bring the whole thing to an end immediately (at the expense of their own party of course). Maybe I don't understand the whole thing, but that's what it seems like to be. As I indicated in the thread title, I think they should dump every single member of the senate since they're all responsible for the fiasco and they're all guilty of abandoning their duties to their constituents.