- Mar 17, 2008
- 23,174
- 12,835
- 136
No but if you and the friend using what you talked about try to break into that bank and it fails?So if I talk to a friend about wanting to rob a bank, thats a crime?
So if I talk to a friend about wanting to rob a bank, thats a crime?
If you are the commanding officer of your subordinate and you ORDER him to carry out the robbery, yes.
That's a crime.
Trump orchestrated and implemented every aspect of the Eastman plot. ONLY Pence's refusal to carry out Trump's direct order stopped it's full attempt.
If a General orders his troops to carry out a war crime and they refuse his order, he is still guilty of attempting to commit a war crime.
Eastman himself is guilty of professional misconduct and loss of his license at the very least. I would say he's guilty of seditious conspiracy since it was his plot the president attempted.
You don’t seem terribly alarmed that we were likely a single person’s choice from the destruction of American democracy.Im aware.
I agree. Whats your point?No but if you and the friend using what you talked about try to break into that bank and it fails?
That is a crime
If Eastman just created that plan and gave it to nobody and did not try to execute it, that isn't a crime
Thats...a stretch.If you are the commanding officer of your subordinate and you ORDER him to carry out the robbery, yes.
That's a crime.
Trump orchestrated and implemented every aspect of the Eastman plot. ONLY Pence's refusal to carry out Trump's direct order stopped it's full attempt.
Direct testimony of Pence refusing Trump's order, and Trump's reaction.
Trump called Pence 'the P-word' and a 'wimp' during a call before the Jan. 6 attack, according to testimony from White House aides
"The conversation was... was pretty heated," said Ivanka Trump in video testimony shown on Thursday by the January 6 committee.www.businessinsider.com
If a General orders his troops to carry out a war crime and they refuse his order, he is still guilty of attempting to commit a war crime.
Eastman himself is guilty of professional misconduct and loss of his license at the very least. I would say he's guilty of seditious conspiracy since it was his plot the president attempted.
You don’t seem terribly alarmed that we were likely a single person’s choice from the destruction of American democracy.
I personally think that would have been bad.
Way to play the "huh? whuh?" game some more. It's a mystery why you do this, but it's obvious that you either enjoy it, obligated, or both.I agree. Whats your point?
Can you explain?No, we werent.
My first sentence is what happened. Why shouldn't Eastman and Trump be charged with a crime??I agree. Whats your point?
He's long been on ignore for me. I still get the theme from the replies.Damn he’s dense. So tempted to add to ignore as well as the fortune cookie
Seemed you skipped the part where fighting erupts in the streets.Also I’m very confident that had the coup succeeded the Republican answer would be to pretend nothing untoward happened. They would just say ‘there were controversies about the electoral votes from some states and the House resolved the issue. The system works.’
Thats...a stretch.
yesCan you explain?
Let’s walk through this step by step. Say Pence does as Trump wanted - that means it goes to the House. Are you saying the House would have elected Biden president despite the republicans controlling a significant majority of congressional state delegations?
If you agree with your friend that you should rob a bank and then take a concrete step in furtherance of that act, that is a crime, yes.So if I talk to a friend about wanting to rob a bank, thats a crime?
Which delegations do you think would have defected? You would need at least three.
Because it was nothing more than talk. No action taken.My first sentence is what happened. Why shouldn't Eastman and Trump be charged with a crime??
If you agree with your friend that you should rob a bank and then take a concrete step in furtherance of that act, that is a crime, yes.
Trump tried to convince pence to enact the plan, which is absolutely an action in furtherance of the offense.Because it was nothing more than talk. No action taken.
No, its not.No, that's the letter of the law. The oath of office makes it clear.