• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The difference between Asians, Caucasians, Blacks.

L

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap9.html

what do you guys think?

i find that the research is done fairly well and the read isn't very boring. it kepy me oging for at least 2 chapters. but i have bookmarked it for continuation on another night. there was too much info to absorb.

i think the author used those famous people (paris hilton, serial killer guy on cover) to attract readers' attention (as would any author)
 
ok

edit: I don't think it's racist. It's a detailed examination on the human evolution.

I question your intent for this thread however because you just basically posted a link without any substance (trollbait?)
 
skimmed over it, too much information to read but what stood out is the only picture of an actual person was of a James Ealy a black man who killed a pregnant woman and 3 kids. Not sure how that was relevant to anything on the page. Seems like a very elaborate page made by someone who is trying to say black people have smaller brains, come from Apes and are prone to violence. That's the only reason I can figure out why they would put the picture of a black convicted killer on there.
 
Originally posted by: QueBert
skimmed over it, too much information to read but what stood out is the only picture of an actual person was of a James Ealy a black man who killed a pregnant woman and 3 kids. Not sure how that was relevant to anything on the page. Seems like a very elaborate page made by someone who is trying to say black people have smaller brains and are prone to violence, that's the only reason I can figure out why they would put the picture of a black convicted killer on there.
Click to expand...

Looks pretty suspicious. It's obviously racist but he has references to everything, though I'm sure his conclusions based on the data are taken out of context.
 
Originally posted by: Shawn
cliffs
Click to expand...

Brain Size

Asian>White>Black>some ancestor/neanderthal/etc

EDIT: taken from an amazon review

By Ronald W. Satz (Trevose, PA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This work is an excellent, though biased, treatment of physical anthropology. The work has numerous, fascinating footnotes and photographs gleaned from the literature. The thesis is that Caucasians and Mongoloids originated from "Eurasia"(OoE)rather than from out of Africa (OoA), and that African Blacks and Australian aboriginals are considerably less-evolved (have more Erectus genes) than whites or Asians. Fuerle dislikes both the low-IQ groups (e.g., African Blacks) and the high-IQ groups (e.g., the Jews), and is opposed to race mixing. He advocates that Caucasians conserve their gene pool (just as the Jews, a subset of Caucasians, do). Thankfully, he doesn't advocate violence. But: what's wrong with laissez-faire? I can agree that different ethnic groups shouldn't be forced to mix, and I can agree that affirmative action programs and welfare are wrong and should be abolished. But: Caucasians and Mongoloids shouldn't be afraid of Blacks. True, they are a main source of crime, as are Hispanic illegals from Mexico, but they are not a military threat. The real threat to the West comes from the Islamo-Fascists. Here, Fuerle doesn't understand the situation at all; he seems to favor the Arab Muslim savages against the fine, advanced civilization created by the Jews in Israel. Aside from these gaffes, the book is worth reading and contemplating.
 
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
Originally posted by: QueBert
skimmed over it, too much information to read but what stood out is the only picture of an actual person was of a James Ealy a black man who killed a pregnant woman and 3 kids. Not sure how that was relevant to anything on the page. Seems like a very elaborate page made by someone who is trying to say black people have smaller brains and are prone to violence, that's the only reason I can figure out why they would put the picture of a black convicted killer on there.
Click to expand...

Looks pretty suspicious. It's obviously racist but he has references to everything, though I'm sure his conclusions based on the data are taken out of context.
Click to expand...

he has references to less bones, smaller size yadda yadda but there's nothing there beyond that. Seems like a shit ton of work to make a site like that so you can prove what's already know. White people have larger brains. Of course that doesn't mean anything directly related to intelligence, but it sounds good in proving a point that actually doesn't even matter.

Actually I looked at the main page of that site, author is a racist asshat, he just happens to be far more elequint than your typical Bubba trailerpark KKK racist asshat.

Both are one in the same to me though.
 
Does this guy have a PHD? The book doesn't seem very scientific, kinda like the pandas creationist book.
 
Originally posted by: Hacp
Does this guy have a PHD? The book doesn't seem very scientific, kinda like the pandas creationist book.
Click to expand...

The author is a retired patent attorney who lives on a small wildlife refuge on an island in upstate of New York. A perpetual student, he has degrees in math (BS), law (JD), economics (MA), physics (BA), and chemistry (BA). He is an amateur composer (www.whiskeyrebellion.us) and has written books on Austrian economics (www.purelogic.us), natural rights (www.naturalrights.us), and anarchy (www.anarchism.net/steppes.htm).
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by: novasatori
Originally posted by: Hacp
Does this guy have a PHD? The book doesn't seem very scientific, kinda like the pandas creationist book.
Click to expand...

The author is a retired patent attorney who lives on a small wildlife refuge on an island in upstate of New York. A perpetual student, he has degrees in math (BS), law (JD), economics (MA), physics (BA), and chemistry (BA). He is an amateur composer (www.whiskeyrebellion.us) and has written books on Austrian economics (www.purelogic.us), natural rights (www.naturalrights.us), and anarchy (www.anarchism.net/steppes.htm).
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So chances are that he's just spewing out what others tell him instead of doing his own research.
 
Originally posted by: Hacp
Originally posted by: novasatori
Originally posted by: Hacp
Does this guy have a PHD? The book doesn't seem very scientific, kinda like the pandas creationist book.
Click to expand...

The author is a retired patent attorney who lives on a small wildlife refuge on an island in upstate of New York. A perpetual student, he has degrees in math (BS), law (JD), economics (MA), physics (BA), and chemistry (BA). He is an amateur composer (www.whiskeyrebellion.us) and has written books on Austrian economics (www.purelogic.us), natural rights (www.naturalrights.us), and anarchy (www.anarchism.net/steppes.htm).
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So chances are that he's just spewing out what others tell him instead of doing his own research.
Click to expand...

You mean citing research done in 1839 isn't good enough for you?
 
I thought it was generally accepted that blacks are very very slightly less evolved than other humans. It also seems to make sense considering the Out of Africa theory since the humans who moved into new climates would have evolved to adapt to the new climates while the blacks in Africa would have stayed the same.
 
Originally posted by: Hacp
Originally posted by: novasatori
Originally posted by: Hacp
Does this guy have a PHD? The book doesn't seem very scientific, kinda like the pandas creationist book.
Click to expand...

The author is a retired patent attorney who lives on a small wildlife refuge on an island in upstate of New York. A perpetual student, he has degrees in math (BS), law (JD), economics (MA), physics (BA), and chemistry (BA). He is an amateur composer (www.whiskeyrebellion.us) and has written books on Austrian economics (www.purelogic.us), natural rights (www.naturalrights.us), and anarchy (www.anarchism.net/steppes.htm).
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So chances are that he's just spewing out what others tell him instead of doing his own research.
Click to expand...

Is this some kind of lame attempt to downplay the fact that this guy has 5 degrees?
 
i am in no means trolling, i was just looking for people on anandtech's forum opinion.

but i looks like most people here didn't even get thruogh the single chapter that i read, chapter 10 is also about the body, just not the hard stuff (bones) but about the organs (soft)
 
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
i am in no means trolling, i was just looking for people on anandtech's forum opinion.

but i looks like most people here didn't even get thruogh the single chapter that i read, chapter 10 is also about the body, just not the hard stuff (bones) but about the organs (soft)
Click to expand...

I stopped when I saw Paris Hilton.
 
it's very interesting.

i dont see how it could be considered racist as far as the research goes. (i dunno about segregation or whatnot, i didnt read that far to know if the author is actually advocating that)

anyways, sexual reproduction over a population typically results in the best traits being expressed again. thus, lassez faire as far as who marries who = a good thing.
 
Hmmm I read through a good portion of chapter 9...
A lot of it is evident just looking at people of difference races.
If you look at an Asian, a Caucasian, and an African and claim there is no difference in their skull then you are a moron....
Pretty much everything I read I could think of a person of that race that had that feature outwardly apparent...
 
Originally posted by: zeruty
Hmmm I read through a good portion of chapter 9...
A lot of it is evident just looking at people of difference races.
If you look at an Asian, a Caucasian, and an African and claim there is no difference in their skull then you are a moron....
Pretty much everything I read I could think of a person of that race that had that feature outwardly apparent...
Click to expand...

so wouldn't it be true if we said that africans more closely resemble apes and other forms of homo erectus than asians and Caucasians?
 
He cites his sources pretty well, and has some good data to back up his premises, but his conclusions do not follow. There is quite a bit of handwaving to get to where he was going. He seems to use sound scientific measurements and twists it to fit his conclusions. It is well known that the "racial science" of the Third Reich was pretty well crap also, despite their detailed analysis of the measurable differences between racial groups and subgroups.

Godwin says I lose this one, but history got to this guy first. I'll settle for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top