• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The difference between a wireless access point and a wireless router?

axemanxt40

Senior member
Ok I am looking for a friend at equipment needed to setup a wireless network, I know all the differences between a, b, and g...however the one I think is best for him, the Netgear g protocol series, has two products. A wireless access point, and a wireless router. Now from what I understand these two do the exact same thing, right? So does it matter which one he goes with? Because they both seem to reroute the signal.
 
A router will usually have firewalling and NAT capabilities, as well as a built in switch for several wired ports as well. An access point just has one wired port to connect it to the rest of the network, and no other features.
 
It's basically the difference between a hub/switch and a router.

One connects devices on the same network, one connects devices on disparate networks.

Most wireless routers can have their routing functions disabled, thus turning them into access points.

Viper GTS
 
this question is better answered in the networking forum. in anycase, look here for a pretty thorough explanation.

basically ur usual "wireless router" is a AP and router put together. a standalone AP is more robust in general and can be used in various ways (bridging 2 networks etc) -- so a router and an AP is more robust than a "wireless router".
 
Back
Top