- Nov 13, 2001
- 15,315
- 395
- 126
http://www.gamespot.com/videos/fallout-4-graphics-comparison/2300-6428029/
seems ps4 is lacking badly :O
seems ps4 is lacking badly :O
XBone looks the worst to me. Terrible shadows and much less vegetation. It's like the low details setting on the PC version.
What a piece of junk.
OK, so I just bought this game. Actually, I was going to buy it anyway. Just forgot to. And, I took tomorrow off so I will be playing this all day.
What do you expect out of Jaguar CPU and 7790?![]()
I can't really tell that much of a difference. Glad I got it for XB1.
me neither. Certainly not enough to complain about. If I noticed anything, it was that the PC version tended to have more ground vegetation. Other than that, I didn't see a lot of differences. Of course, when I get it, it'll be on the PC.
Only thing I'm thinking I might regret are the load times... but I did an XB360 to PC comparison for FO3 and I didn't think the added load time was all that terrible. If it's a similar separation, I'll live.
However there are already links out there saying PS4 load times are up to 40 seconds... not sure I can live with that... may regret having sold my PC cdkey.
I can't really tell that much of a difference. Glad I got it for XB1.
me neither. Certainly not enough to complain about. If I noticed anything, it was that the PC version tended to have more ground vegetation. Other than that, I didn't see a lot of differences. Of course, when I get it, it'll be on the PC.
correct me if im wrong but isn't consoles only in 30fps?
that alone i could not tolerate.
correct me if im wrong but isn't consoles only in 30fps?
that alone i could not tolerate.
i would put the console peasants above teh apple heathens.