• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Desktop Environment Debate

zokudu

Diamond Member
Hey there. I'm curious what DE you guys are using and why you have chosen it. With KDE (allegidly) improving a lot with version 4.8, GNOME 3 being a huge shift from previous GNOME DEs, Cinnamon and MATE forking from GNOME 2 it seems like a very different landscape than has been in the past.

I'm asking because I'm planning on testing Arch Linux this summer (Plan on doing a write up about it 😉) and maybe into next school year once I get my laptop back from Dell (Hinge broke 🙁).

I had actually been messing with it right when the hinge broke and had been running GNOME 3 at the time after abandoning KDE again.

So what are you using and why? I'm leaning towards XFCE when my laptop returns but I want to see you linux peoples arguments.
 
I run Kubuntu 12.04 with KDE 4.8 and am as happy with it as with the old KDE 3.

I was initially disappointed with KDE 4 and stuck with KDE 3.5 until KDE 4.4 was released so I am hard to please.
 
Xfce. It uses the classic computing paradigm, and works the way I want it to work. I also like E17 and OpenBox. The problem with the last two is poor panel implementation. I don't care for KDE. I don't like the look, and it has too much stuff.

I have some interest in Cinnamon and MATÉ, but I'm kind of a bandwagoner. I like my software to be well supported, and have a stable future. I need to wait and see if these 2 have staying power. That's why I use Xfce. They've been around awhile, and I feel they have the same vision of the desktop I have. I don't think I have to worry about radical change. Incidentally, that's why I switched to Debian. It gives me everything I liked about Ubuntu, without some grand vision from above screwing up my gig. Debian provides software, and I can use it or not. No wacky desktops, no changing colors or logos, and nothing that strays far from the core GNU/Linux system. It does what I want.
 
Pretty much what Ixskllr said (and it's probably no accident I'm also running a Debian-based distro and xfce). Xfce works pretty much how I want and doesn't make a pain of itself, and is just shiny enough that I don't feel like I am living in the dark ages.
 
+2 Xfce

Xfce is what I install for family and friends, does all they need.

For me I prefer a tiling WM; xmonad being my choice. This works great for me, since I do most tasks in a terminal[urxvt].
 
I use Gnome 3. Like most people, I bashed it when it came out originally. However, after getting my new laptop last year I decided to use it for two weeks and if I didn't like I'd switch. You can tell how that went. 😉

IMO the GNOME developers got it right. Dynamic workspaces are great, removing the minimize and maximize buttons was a ballsy move, but they can be put back if need be. GNOME 3 also has a lot of polish and subtle tweaks to things that may not have been easy to implement with GNOME 2.
 
Last edited:
So what are you using and why? I'm leaning towards XFCE when my laptop returns but I want to see you linux peoples arguments.
I'm smitten with Peppermint OS Two, lately, soooo LXDE on the netbook & USB thumbdrives.

On the desktop: Ubu Unity/Gnome 3.

Everything else bores me... or pisses me off. 😎
 
my more powerful laptop that I'm using as a desktop is running debian squeeze and still has gnome 2 but the netbook I take to school with me has gnome 3. I find myself at home throwing the mouse into the top left corner and starting to type. Things got better once I turned off compiz.
 
I find myself still using GNOME 2 in most of my boxes, which are mostly CentOS and RHEL 5.8 and 6.2 based. It's an old staple, and it feels like home. After 6 years of using mostly GNOME 2, any other desktop environment just feels off.

Otherwise, I use OpenBox on #! on a regular basis on my low-powered machines (an old Atom box and my Lenovo T61), with a little GNOME 3 on OpenSUSE on my old workstation. LXDE and XFCE are used sparingly sometimes, when I feel a need for a change of scenery.
 
I (mostly) used gnome in the past, maybe 70% of the time...

Now I used KDE on my heavy rig usually, and XFCE on wussier computers and smaller screens, laptops and such. Sometimes I still run XFCE on the main computer though, if i'm feeling minimalist :awe:

Gnome 3 is an abortion from what I've tried - I've been running it in fallback mode on one laptop, and it's much less awful, but still broken compared to 2. In 'normal' mode it's a fucking circus. I started laughing the first time I accidentally upgraded to it, wtf were they thinking.
 
I run Arch with Gnome Shell. I love it as it as I can work very, very fast with the shell and not have to use the mouse/touchpad that much.

Not a fan of KDE, LXDE/XFCE are ok, and Unity is just god awful.
 
This XFCE you speak of kind sir please tell me more.

This Ubuntu 12.04 must go, no matter what I do I still do not like it.


May I move all "taskbar's" and other items to the bottom of the screen? Without having to install a bunch of other crap that I have to install still more crap to fix the other crap?


Yea, I am about to loose my inner S.O.B. on Unity....

I want it simple, I want it clean, I do not want stuff dancing around on the screen.

By the way Mint did not impress me either. Cinnamon caused other issues that I did want to deal with.


.
 
This XFCE you speak of kind sir please tell me more.

op3KT.jpg
 
I like earth tones. Ubuntu switching from brown was the start of our divorce :^D

I usually use some form of brown or green, but sometimes grey. I was always a big fan of the Rainy Day theme on Windows.

Yeah. I remember using Ubuntu 6.06 LTS, and the orange and brown was really nice.
 
Back
Top