PhineasJWhoopee
Banned
I think that the great harm the methodology of Darwinism has had on science is well stated by W.R. Thompson in his introduction to a 1963 reprint of "The Origin of Species":
"The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific intergrity. This is already evident in the reckless statements of Haeckel and in the shifty, devious and histrionic arguments of T.H. Huxley...
To establish the continuity required by the theory (of evolution), historical arguments are invoked even though historical evidence is lacking. Thus are engendered those fragile towers of hypothesis, where fact and fictions intermingle in an inextricable confusion."
The widespread acceptance of this "new scientific method" in which imagination, speculation, and "consensus" take the place of rigorous experimental proof, threatens to pull science back toward the days of superstition.
"The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific intergrity. This is already evident in the reckless statements of Haeckel and in the shifty, devious and histrionic arguments of T.H. Huxley...
To establish the continuity required by the theory (of evolution), historical arguments are invoked even though historical evidence is lacking. Thus are engendered those fragile towers of hypothesis, where fact and fictions intermingle in an inextricable confusion."
The widespread acceptance of this "new scientific method" in which imagination, speculation, and "consensus" take the place of rigorous experimental proof, threatens to pull science back toward the days of superstition.