• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Constant Gardener

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I just watched this movie on Saturday and it was AWFUL. The most dreadful cinematic waste of time this side of Ronin. What sucks the most is that it COULD have been an incredible story, but whoever directed and produced it was so concerned with making it artsy and award-worthy that they forgot to make it interesting and captive.
 
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: Fausto
Good movie and Rachel Weisz gets nekkid. Win/win situation. 😀

I dunno, pregnant women don't really do it for me. To each his own.

Good movie.

Other than the stomach "makeup" that was not a pregant woman's body. Trust me on this.
 
i don't understand why rachel weisz won an award for this movie.

she did well, but not THAT well...

good movie overall though
 
Originally posted by: jndietz
there is a guy in my hometown who does nothing but tends to his yard and his plants all day.

For those of you who haven't seen the movie, it really doesn't have jack to do with gardening, which, is not a good thing. Watching a guy fertilize a fern for 3 hours would have been just as entertaining and much cheaper to produce. Were he to use his own semen, that would be a notch higher.
 
The movie is a great cure for insomnia. Watch it along with the English Patient, and Lord of War, you'll be comatose for a year.
 
Originally posted by: jbourne77
I just watched this movie on Saturday and it was AWFUL. The most dreadful cinematic waste of time this side of Ronin. What sucks the most is that it COULD have been an incredible story, but whoever directed and produced it was so concerned with making it artsy and award-worthy that they forgot to make it interesting and captive.

I agree. I watched it a week or so ago. Boring and it was so predictable. After about 45-60 minutes I was searching for the netflix envelope to see how much longer it was. The best part of the movie was when I paused it and took a sh*t.
 
Back
Top