Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
the democrats will not win the presidency in 2004
hillary will run in 2008 and loose (she is unelectable...trust me on this)
therefore, a republican will sit in the whitehouse for at least until 2012 (if reelected 2016)..count on it.
call him a chimp..i don't care.
your heroes (the disbarred, impeached, perjurer, adulterous ex-president, and his beastly "wife/senator") are making it
impossible for the democrats to regain the white house for at least 12 years (probably 16 years).
live with it.
Agree 100%, now if we could get fiscally responsible old skool republicans in office and not these masked big governmnet socialists I'd be very happy. So who for McCain? Well they already branded him the "i love you candidate" in 00".
We are going to need a few more senate seats before any president could really do anything to control spending.
I don't know? Historically every New-republican administration of late (since RR) has increased speading... Admititly they did not have control of both houses until GW, but they have not shown a willingness to control it either. 450B this year is just insane and of course mostly spent by Bush because it's politically expediant to do so. Medicaid/Homeland Security etc all these new programs championed by Bush. I just don't see it. Then tax cuts. Well that's great but why spend MORE then. I just don't think it's responsible.
While i agree we should be spending less, but the the reduced tax receipts are hurting at least much as the increased spending.