The case going before SCOTUS that could cement the Republican takeover of the Democracy

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,646
8,186
136
Legalese aside and from a practical point of view, it seems many Repub controlled states are virtually running their states in that fashion such that having the SCOTUS decide in favor of that policy is rather moot because all it would do is apply the court's stamp of approval on it.

This rigged court, and yes, it now really is rigged in corporate America's favor with (among others) religion, racism, 2A and pseudo-patriotism (MAGA) being the window dressing and all-purpose distractions, has shown its hand as a mere political tool of the conservative "movement", having abandoned any pretext as an institution that is beholden to ALL of the nation's citizens rather than a select few powerbrokers that have successfully corrupted the court to its will.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,474
10,922
136
Legalese aside and from a practical point of view, it seems many Repub controlled states are virtually running their states in that fashion such that having the SCOTUS decide in favor of that policy is rather moot because all it would do is apply the court's stamp of approval on it.

This rigged court, and yes, it now really is rigged in corporate America's favor with (among others) religion, racism, 2A and pseudo-patriotism (MAGA) being the window dressing and all-purpose distractions, has shown its hand as a mere political tool of the conservative "movement", having abandoned any pretext as an institution that is beholden to ALL of the nation's citizens rather than a select few powerbrokers that have successfully corrupted the court to its will.

I tend to agree. We're already there in many states due to numerous factors (gerrymandering, etc.). And all this will do is make it official and grant it "legitimacy".
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,981
9,866
136
Sounds as if the US, very much like the EU, is giving up on the idea that the constituent parts have to be democracies. This seems like the Supreme Court is moving towards allowing individual states to be dictatorships, or at least to abandon the idea of one-person one-vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and Leeea

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
The legislature has claimed that the U.S. Constitution gives it authority, unfettered by state courts' interpretation of the state constitution or laws, to regulate congressional elections, and is asking the Supreme Court to agree.

I'm not sure if it was just simplified, but my understanding was that states governed their own elections. However, with that simplistic definition of "states", doesn't that also include the state's court? Or does the actual wording specifically refer to the state's legislature? It seems like the legislature wants to ignore the inherent checks and balances that are supposed to keep things in line.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,376
32,949
136
I'm not sure if it was just simplified, but my understanding was that states governed their own elections. However, with that simplistic definition of "states", doesn't that also include the state's court? Or does the actual wording specifically refer to the state's legislature? It seems like the legislature wants to ignore the inherent checks and balances that are supposed to keep things in line.
Yep, the current state legislatures want to ignore current state laws and state constitutions to get what they want instead of going through the process of repealing/amending them.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,981
9,866
136
What's the point of even having a State Constitution, if state legislatures can ignore it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo