The Bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee Findings Are In - NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION

[SlowSpyder]

Have a look below. Just more evidence that this was little more than a political witch hunt. Despite the continued attacks by the left, Trump has gotten a tremendous amount accomplished in just two years, and hopefully there are six more years of winning ahead of America. The left lost in 2016, cannot reconcile how America rejected their platform of hate and create-a-victim mentality. They couldn't deal with losing so they've been throwing a tantrum for two years and counting, and some drank the Kookaid to the point they actually thought Trump would be impeached (LOL). Lefties, you lost this one, Trump gets his four year term. Get over yourselves.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...nce-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536

"ASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigationinto the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee. "


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/07/richard-burr-senate-russia-investigation-1156624

Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion


https://thehill.com/policy/national...rman-we-dont-have-anything-to-prove-collusion


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...e_of_russian_collusion_in_trump_campaign.html





Already under discussion.

AT Moderator ElFenix

 

[Indus]

LOL Fake News!

 

[SlowSpyder]

LOL Fake News!

The committee was bipartisan. Second word in the title.

You ninja you.

 

[Indus]

The committee was bipartisan. Second word in the title.

The democrats offered their own report differing from that report.

Watch this whole thing:

 

[SlowSpyder]

The democrats offered their own report differing from that report.

Watch this whole thing:

45 minutes of Maddow. No thanks.

 

[Indus]

45 minutes of Maddow. No thanks.

Like we all know.. you don't read facts.. you just parrot GRU koolaid.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Like we all know.. you don't read facts.. you just parrot GRU koolaid.

I provided several links, even the liberal media has admitted this. Some of the links I even gave quotes saying there was no evidence of collusion found. I think you're the one ignoring facts here.

 

[Indus]

I provided several links, even the liberal media has admitted this. Some of the links I even gave quotes saying there was no evidence of collusion found. I think you're the one ignoring facts here.

Really? Me ignoring?

You refuse to watch the facts which are right in front ofyou.

Maybe if you watched the video you'd know about Kilimink and Manafort collusion.

 

[Indus]

And are you reading impaired??

First line from: https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/politics/warner-burr-senate-russia-collusion-question/index.html

Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, rejected Republican Chairman Richard Burr's recent statements that the committee has not found evidence of collusion

 

[interchange]

Also important is that the Senate is only following direct evidence and has limited powers to conduct an investigation compared to Mueller.

But I think what is obvious and has been from the start is that Trump is exploiting the actions of Russia for his benefit and rewarding it for them in ways that completely undermine the US. He deserved removal from office long, long ago for such. And that's apart from a whole other set of criminal activity unrelated to Russia, general corruption in his organization, declaration of national emergency solely to bypass Congress (he admitted openly it wasn't necessary), etc.

I think it's certain at this point Mueller will have findings against Trump directly. It hasn't mattered to me for a long time except in what is required for lawmakers to take an action long warranted already.

 

[SlowSpyder]

AT P&N sounds like:

You guys are funny. There it is in plain English in the stories I posted. No evidence found.

 

[soundforbjt]

AT P&N sounds like:

You guys are funny. There it is in plain English in the stories I posted. No evidence found.

By a republican headed committee that didn't/couldn't look at all of the evidence available. Republicans would have no reason to keep their leader from harm would they? Let's see what Mueller and the new house investigations find before declaring victory ok, I'm willing to wait.

 

[umbrella39]

One has to wonder why the slow account handler is allowed to post so many bald faced lies without being challenged by the staff...

REPOST anyway. The GOP who STILL rightfully and thankfully are not privy to the same information Muller is has been claiming this since day one. Fake News.

LMFAO

When collusion by the crooked GOP exonerates the criminal and treasonous POTUS....

That's the FuckTard conservaterrorists wet dream!

 

[SlowSpyder]

One has to wonder why the slow account handler is allowed to post so many bald faced lies without being challenged by the staff...

REPOST anyway. The GOP who STILL rightfully and thankfully are not privy to the same information Muller is has been claiming this since day one. Fake News.

LMFAO

When collusion by the crooked GOP exonerates the criminal and treasonous POTUS....

That's the FuckTard conservaterrorists wet dream!

I'm not lying. I understand more will come from the Mueller probe, but the senate probe is not finding anything (witch hunt). The news stories posted say the same.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Your Republicans are lying.

Fact: This is the relevant part of the Mueller mandate, so stuff the spin.


Any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.


Note "associated". Roger Stone was associated and an active agent of the campaign.

Oh look, collusion.

BUT BUT TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No buts, this is what the Mueller investigation is in part about and lookie here, he found what you say doesn't exist. Whether Trump had knowledge/participated remains to be seen, but collusion, indeed conspiracy with Russian agents has a basis in fact as defined in the mandate.

Sorry about that, not.

 

[Jhhnn]

Poor Slow. It's gotta be tough trying to represent "no direct evidence" as "no evidence". It's perfectly obvious that TrumpCo & Putin's boys were thick as thieves.

 

[soundforbjt]

Poor Slow. It's gotta be tough trying to represent "no direct evidence" as "no evidence". It's perfectly obvious that TrumpCo & Putin's boys were thick as thieves.

Yeah, Trump who always made every decision in his businesses knew nothing about what anyone was doing in his campaign. That sounds likely...not !

 

[Uhtrinity]

I'll wait for Mueller's Report for two reasons:

1. Neither the house or senate reports were 'Bi-partisan'. There were two reports, one from each party, or at least two conclusions. They didn't go deep, didn't follow all available threads, etc. House members are on record saying the connections became too complex, not everyone was interviewed, ie, "the rabbit hole was deep".
2. How were these findings affected by testimony that has since found to be false as the witness perjured him/herself. Think Cohen. It happened with the Partisan house report and now with the Senate report.

 

[Jhhnn]

I'll wait for Mueller's Report for two reasons:

1. Neither the house or senate reports were 'Bi-partisan'. There were two reports, one from each party, or at least two conclusions. They didn't go deep, didn't follow all available threads, etc. House members are on record saying the connections became too complex, not everyone was interviewed, ie, "the rabbit hole was deep".
2. How were these findings affected by testimony that has since found to be false as the witness perjured him/herself. Think Cohen. It happened with the Partisan house report and now with the Senate report.

Meh. Under Nunes, the House hearings were a total hack job intended to thwart honest discourse let alone honest investigation. It was coordinated both with the White House & Sessions, the AG. To Burr's credit, the Senate investigation hasn't been that at all. Democrats on the committee have not claimed foul play. The committee issued this honest & stark report some while back-

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/12/1...report-african-american-ira-clinton-instagram

 

[fskimospy]

First, the Democrats rejected the characterization that there was no evidence of collusion.

Second, EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION IS LITERALLY ALREADY IN THE UNDISPUTED PUBLIC RECORD. We literally have emails from Don Jr. where one side says ‘we would like to give you this information as part of the Russian government’s support for Trump’ and he says ‘I love it’.

Like, this is in black and white. Nobody disputes it. OP is living in a fantasy world.

 

[fskimospy]

Also OP’s title is directly contradicted by his sources. It’s a lie and should be changed.

 

[cytg111]

45 minutes of Maddow. No thanks.

Idiot.

 

[NL5]

Second, EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION IS LITERALLY ALREADY IN THE UNDISPUTED PUBLIC RECORD. We literally have emails from Don Jr. where one side says ‘we would like to give you this information as part of the Russian government’s support for Trump’ and he says ‘I love it’.

Not to mention Manafort colluding with Kilimnick, and Stone with Guccifer and Wikileaks. All in public court filings. The only thing left to prove is Trumps involvement. The fact that they are still heavily redacting court filings due to ongoing investigations doesn't look good for Trump. Who's left above Manafort and Stone?

 

[SlowSpyder]

Also OP’s title is directly contradicted by his sources. It’s a lie and should be changed.

Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion

 

[Jhhnn]

First, the Democrats rejected the characterization that there was no evidence of collusion.

Second, EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION IS LITERALLY ALREADY IN THE UNDISPUTED PUBLIC RECORD. We literally have emails from Don Jr. where one side says ‘we would like to give you this information as part of the Russian government’s support for Trump’ and he says ‘I love it’.

Like, this is in black and white. Nobody disputes it. OP is living in a fantasy world.

Burr rejects it as well when he specifies "no *direct* evidence" of Trump's personal involvement. He never said that indirect evidence isn't abundant & damning. Not at all.