• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The bible and slavery.

dowxp

Diamond Member
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_bibl.htm

"Eventually, the abolitionists gained sufficient power to eradicate slavery in most areas of the world by the end of the 19th century. Slavery was eventually recognized as a extreme evil. But this paradigm shift in understanding came at a cost. Christians wondered why the Bible was so supportive of such an immoral practice. They questioned whether the Bible was entirely reliable. Perhaps there were other practices that it accepted as normal which were profoundly evil -- like genocide, torturing prisoners, raping female prisoners of war, executing religious minorities, burning some hookers alive, etc. The innocent faith that Christians had in "the Good Book" was lost -- never to be fully regained. "

Of course slavery is wrong, but that isn't my point. Why does the bible support slavery so much? of course, one has to take into account interpretations from liberal and other various views...

No flaming -- im writing a report and im having a hard time justifying slavery using the bible... because it doesn't deny it!
 
This is a viewpoint coming from an ex-Christian who hasn't intensely studied his bible in a year or so.

If I recall correctly, the Bible never goes so far as to endorse it, either. Like many other social issues, Christianity (and Judaism) leaves many gray moral issues up for debate. As well, it also generally refers to slaves as the spoils of war or those enslaved in order to repay debts. It doesn't refer to slavery as Americans know it, where it was a practice conducted entirely on skin color.
 
Originally posted by: pulse8
Because that's what they did back then.

yes, but even Jesus did not denounce it. Perhaps it would have been too "crazy" of an idea"

Originally posted by: Dari
The Bible is man-made. Period.

erm, well to believe in the bible requires faith that the bible is God's word. thats the problem.
 
Originally posted by: Zakath15
This is a viewpoint coming from an ex-Christian who hasn't intensely studied his bible in a year or so. If I recall correctly, the Bible never goes so far as to endorse it, either. Like many other social issues, Christianity (and Judaism) leaves many gray moral issues up for debate. As well, it also generally refers to slaves as the spoils of war or those enslaved in order to repay debts. It doesn't refer to slavery as Americans know it, where it was a practice conducted entirely on skin color.

so slavery back then was based upon debts and other issues? that would make more sense...
 
Originally posted by: Zakath15
This is a viewpoint coming from an ex-Christian who hasn't intensely studied his bible in a year or so.

If I recall correctly, the Bible never goes so far as to endorse it, either. Like many other social issues, Christianity (and Judaism) leaves many gray moral issues up for debate. As well, it also generally refers to slaves as the spoils of war or those enslaved in order to repay debts. It doesn't refer to slavery as Americans know it, where it was a practice conducted entirely on skin color.

Uhuh....
 
Originally posted by: Bangsailio
Originally posted by: Zakath15
This is a viewpoint coming from an ex-Christian who hasn't intensely studied his bible in a year or so. If I recall correctly, the Bible never goes so far as to endorse it, either. Like many other social issues, Christianity (and Judaism) leaves many gray moral issues up for debate. As well, it also generally refers to slaves as the spoils of war or those enslaved in order to repay debts. It doesn't refer to slavery as Americans know it, where it was a practice conducted entirely on skin color.

so slavery back then was based upon debts and other issues? that would make more sense...

I could be completely talking out of my ass, as I'm sure racism was endemic in those populations as well. But I seem to remember more verses referring to the Israelites (or whomever) enslaving prisoners of war and so forth, rather than referring to "and he was enslaved, because he was black."
 
Another thing that Jesus preached, from what I do remember...

Whenever he preached, he generally preached integration of faith into one's daily life (beyond the obvious religious obligations and styles of thought) - he did nothing to advocate active (governmental) revolution; he preached a mentally and spiritually satisfying faith with practical applications.

When he spoke of slaves at all, I got the impression that he was telling them to do their work so that their masters would see the "glory of god" through them; he spoke nothing of the moral correctness of their situation.
 
Why does the bible support slavery so much?

That's how the times were, it's like us saying in 800 years...Why did society force people to go to school!? 'Cause they'll prolly just be able to download information into their head...The Bible strongly encourages having that slave like a another family member, but he works a little more...

-Brent
 
You have to pick the parts of the bible you want to believe, and those you don't.

Such as, homosexuals are evil, so we believe the part of the bible that suggests so.

But, bacon is good, and we shouldn't sell our women into slavery, so we don't believe that part.
 
slavery back then was much more economical (servants) and economically political (spoils of war) than purely political (racism and superiority of genes). The Egyptians (who were black) didn't enslave the israelites because of their race but because of a conflict.

It was only in recent times (relatively speaking) that people began to make excuses for the horrors of slavery by justifying it in political terms (superiority complex). Seen purely from a business and economically political p.o.v., slavery could still be a current event. But once morality is added to the picture, it becomes evident that such an institution cannot survive in any civilization that also preaches the virtues of human rights.
 
is there any biblical basis for any of the remarks being made in this thread? i love it when this happens on atot and people tend to make up whatever they want, but almost never do you actually see verses that would reference a point being made. this may just be because people here don't have access to the Bible, but i think a little education should go into some people's thought processes before they start talking about things they really don't know so much about.
 
Originally posted by: Dari
The Bible is man-made. Period.
So why even post in this thread? Do you feel THAT threatened?
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
I don't understand the "That's what they did back then" argument. Isn't the bible supposed to be written by God?
Why don't you read it and find out?
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Dari
The Bible is man-made. Period.
So why even post in this thread? Do you feel THAT threatened?
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
I don't understand the "That's what they did back then" argument. Isn't the bible supposed to be written by God?
Why don't you read it and find out?

I posted because I've done extensive studies on western religions, Christianity in particular. While religion is good for the stability of any society, I'm still amazed at how people will believe anything they read from a source they have faith in. From a morally philospohical p.o.v, the bible is top-notch. But from a historical p.o.v., it has more holes than swiss cheese.
 
Originally posted by: Hitman32
Can God create a stone that he cannot throw?
Dumbest most idiotic argument ever. :|
Can God stop being God? There's your answer.
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Another thing that Jesus preached, from what I do remember...

Whenever he preached, he generally preached integration of faith into one's daily life (beyond the obvious religious obligations and styles of thought) - he did nothing to advocate active (governmental) revolution; he preached a mentally and spiritually satisfying faith with practical applications.

When he spoke of slaves at all, I got the impression that he was telling them to do their work so that their masters would see the "glory of god" through them; he spoke nothing of the moral correctness of their situation.
This is actually correct.
What Jesus taught is that there is no condition on earth, it being a brief temporary phase of all eternity, that was worth losing your soul for.
He did not teach people to be cows either. He taught that everyone should treat others as they would wish to be treated and that people should lead by example, not by force. One aspect that Jesus seemed very much aware of was that people needed to learn to control their negative and violent emotions. In a world where everyone treats each other as they would be treated, slavery would be lifted forever and the final revolution would be one of absolute peace.

btw, everyone on the internet has access to the Bible: Link

Please remember that the Israelites themselves had been slaves and that they, as a culture, were generally opposed to slavery when compared to the other cultures that surrounded them.
btw, this is the "in"famous passage from the Bible that some people use to claim that it supports slavery:

Leviticus 25:38-55

38 I am the LORD your God, which brought you forth out of the land of Egypt, to give you the land of Canaan, and to be your God.
39 And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee; thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bondservant:
40 But as an hired servant, and as a sojourner, he shall be with thee, and shall serve thee unto the year of jubile*.
41 And then shall he depart from thee, both he and his children with him, and shall return unto his own family, and unto the possession of his fathers shall he return.
42 For they are my servants, which I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: they shall not be sold as bondmen.
43 Thou shalt not rule over him with rigour; but shalt fear thy God.
44 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.
47 And if a sojourner or stranger wax rich by thee, and thy brother that dwelleth by him wax poor, and sell himself unto the stranger or sojourner by thee, or to the stock of the stranger's family:
48 After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him:
49 Either his uncle, or his uncle's son, may redeem him, or any that is nigh of kin unto him of his family may redeem him; or if he be able, he may redeem himself.
50 And he shall reckon with him that bought him from the year that he was sold to him unto the year of jubile: and the price of his sale shall be according unto the number of years, according to the time of an hired servant shall it be with him.
51 If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for.
52 And if there remain but few years unto the year of jubile, then he shall count with him, and according unto his years shall he give him again the price of his redemption.
53 And as a yearly hired servant shall he be with him: and the other shall not rule with rigour over him in thy sight.
54 And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubile, both he, and his children with him.
55 For unto me the children of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

* every 50th year in Israel, all debts were cancelled and all slaves were freed, edit: this was the year of jubile (pronouced like jubilee)
 
What I got from what I read of the bible with the whole slave issue is that slave type service of humans was really only being done through the will of humans. I don't see what is meant by saying the bible supports it though, as it only really refers to it as a way of life, and talks of treating slaves like you would any other person. Back in the day (old testament) slaves were treated like people who work in a normal working environment by todays standards, if anything it was probably just their form of work back then. We all know the story of the jews and their slave labor though and evidently God was not happy about that, so he handled his buisness. I wont get into wether he's real or not, that's for everyone to decide for themselfs.
 
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: Zakath15
This is a viewpoint coming from an ex-Christian who hasn't intensely studied his bible in a year or so.

If I recall correctly, the Bible never goes so far as to endorse it, either. Like many other social issues, Christianity (and Judaism) leaves many gray moral issues up for debate. As well, it also generally refers to slaves as the spoils of war or those enslaved in order to repay debts. It doesn't refer to slavery as Americans know it, where it was a practice conducted entirely on skin color.

Uhuh....

am I wrong?
 
while reading Locke for my government class last semester, i found that most accounts of "slavery" weren't the same as was in early America. most slaves were those captured during wars where they could live and serve those who conquered them or die.

and no where in the bible have i read anything about slavery as an endorsement of it.
 
Back
Top