The band is back together (Engadget editors)

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
I was really hoping the guys would stay together.

http://kara.allthingsd.com/20110403...er-engadget-team-for-competing-new-tech-site/

Jim Bankoff, the fomer AOL exec responsible for buying Engadget for the Internet portal, has grabbed eight staffers who had left the huge tech site amid tensions recently, in order to start a new gadget content property.
The site, which is still unnamed, will debut sometime in the fall, as part of content expansion at the Washington, D.C. sports news site SB Nation, which is helmed by Bankoff.
The new site will be run by former Engadget editor-in-chief Josh Topolsky, as well as managing editor Nilay Patel. Also included in the tech-exodus–techxodus?–are former Engadget staffers Paul Miller, Joanna Stern, Ross Miller, Chris Ziegler, Justin Glow and Dan Chilton.
All of the above had left Engadget in a series of departures of late, all due to increasing unhappiness with AOL’s management and content strategy.
Paul Miller and Ross Miller, who are not related, both stated publicly that they did not like the editorial direction AOL was going in, especially a controversial content strategy document titled “The AOL Way.”
New AOL content head Arianna Huffington has shifted more toward a more journalistic path, but the talent bleed began before AOL’s $315 million purchase of the Huffington Post.
Sources said that while the new SB Nation gadget site will be similar in pace and topic, it wil be broader than Engadget.
The move is an interesting one for SB Nation, which completed a $10.5 million Series C round, led by Khosla Ventures, in the fall. It had already raised about $13 million in total venture funding from Accel Partners, Allen & Company and Comcast Interactive Capital, as well as from angel investors such as Ted Leonsis and others in Silicon Valley.
In related news, also restarting tomorrow will be a popular gadget podcast that Topolsky, Patel and Paul Miller had done for Engadget
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
I'd definitely read that site if this is true. I really liked those guys so I'll definitely check it out if they do it.
 

Sheep

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,275
0
71
I knew about Topolsky and Patel leaving Engadget but I had no clue all those others did too. Yikes.

Looking forward to the new site.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
As a commenter there noted... didn't I see this on Mad Men?
 

Phobic9

Golden Member
Apr 6, 2001
1,822
0
71
I knew about Topolsky and Patel leaving Engadget but I had no clue all those others did too. Yikes.

Looking forward to the new site.

Yeah I had no idea Joanna left as well. She does pretty good as the laptop reviewer.

I'm looking forward to the new site nevertheless.
 

tdawg

Platinum Member
May 18, 2001
2,215
6
81
I knew about Topolsky and Patel leaving Engadget but I had no clue all those others did too. Yikes.

Looking forward to the new site.

Ditto. Looks like I'll migrate away from Engadget towards this new site.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Had to know something was going on with all of their most well known guys leaving within a short time.

Anyway, whether it was AOL's influence or what, the quality of journalism at Endgaget has been going down lately (frankly, sometimes the offenders were among the group that left)...we'll see what happens in the future. I've already permanently boycotted Gawker @ co...am I down to BGR?
 

Sheep

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,275
0
71
I've already permanently boycotted Gawker @ co...am I down to BGR?

The quality of Gawker's content was declining significantly even before they initiated the worst site redesign in the history of the internet. That was the final nail in the coffin for me.

It's BGR and ArsTechnica for me. I realize Ars covers different ground than the Engadgets and Gizmodos of the world but there's enough similar content there that it works for me. The far better quality of Ars' discussions also doesn't hurt.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
The quality of Gawker's content was declining significantly even before they initiated the worst site redesign in the history of the internet. That was the final nail in the coffin for me.

It's BGR and ArsTechnica for me. I realize Ars covers different ground than the Engadgets and Gizmodos of the world but there's enough similar content there that it works for me. The far better quality of Ars' discussions also doesn't hurt.

I was irked with the way Gizmodo handled the whole iPhone 4 situation - how they tried to be sleezy and print an article about the guy who "lost" the phone, claiming to be trying to "clear" him, all the while really just trying to put the heat on him and off of them. So I was already disliking them....and then one day, somewhere along the line, their forwarding got screwed up, causing gizmodo.com to actually open up fleshbot....yea, thats JUST what I wanted to see at work!

Haven't been to Gizmodo since...they're sorry excuses for "journalists". My only Gawker experience since then was the whole Brett Favre/Jen Sterger thing, where the guy promised her he wouldn't release the story, and then, ya know, did it anyway. Another example of them lowering the bar...

Basically, they suck, and that was before this site redesign that I haven't seen but is apparently terrible.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
I was irked with the way Gizmodo handled the whole iPhone 4 situation - how they tried to be sleezy and print an article about the guy who "lost" the phone, claiming to be trying to "clear" him, all the while really just trying to put the heat on him and off of them. So I was already disliking them....and then one day, somewhere along the line, their forwarding got screwed up, causing gizmodo.com to actually open up fleshbot....yea, thats JUST what I wanted to see at work!

Haven't been to Gizmodo since...they're sorry excuses for "journalists". My only Gawker experience since then was the whole Brett Favre/Jen Sterger thing, where the guy promised her he wouldn't release the story, and then, ya know, did it anyway. Another example of them lowering the bar...

Basically, they suck, and that was before this site redesign that I haven't seen but is apparently terrible.

Don't forget their little TVBeGone stunt they pulled at CES that got them in a bunch of shit.
 

pm

Elite Member Mobile Devices
Jan 25, 2000
7,419
22
81
Yeah, I stopped reading Gizmodo after the CES TV thing... I've been a company presenter at major shows in the past and they are super stressful affairs. If you are demo'ing something and it doesn't work... (like, say, a TV) it can truly be a nightmare. If they'd done it once or twice it might have been funny, but as someone who has been on the receiving end of bad demos, I had complete empathy for the presenters.

I thought the iPhone 4 thing was in poor taste too when they outted the guy who lost it. Putting profits (and page views) and publicity above the real-world situation.

On the other hand, I read Engadget daily, and sometimes multiple-times daily. If they start a new site, and it looks good, I'll follow them. My loyalty is to what I find interesting and useful.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Can they please get this up and running ASAP? Engadget is unreadable now, and not just its comments section.

edit: ugh, not until fall
 
Last edited:

Phobic9

Golden Member
Apr 6, 2001
1,822
0
71
Josh's bias got a little annoying sometimes but the quality has definitely been going down at Engadget slowly since most of the post-Block/Rojas crew left.
 
Last edited:
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
I thought Engadget banned me for iOS vs Android flame wars, but I usually post blatant troll jokes, so it's not really anything too bad. Most of the flamers there are far worse.

But instead I looked at my Disqus history and my last comment regarding the HTC Sensation article was:

" fix your white balance please Engadget.... tell me you guys learned to shoot in RAW and know how to do some basic Adobe Lightroom :D"

Apparently I got banned for that. Pathetic. LOL.

Edit: NM They banned my whole school's network. I VNCed home and could still post. Odd. Good to know someone on campus got the whole network banned :D
 
Last edited:

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
I thought Engadget banned me for iOS vs Android flame wars, but I usually post blatant troll jokes, so it's not really anything too bad. Most of the flamers there are far worse.

But instead I looked at my Disqus history and my last comment regarding the HTC Sensation article was:

" fix your white balance please Engadget.... tell me you guys learned to shoot in RAW and know how to do some basic Adobe Lightroom :D"

Apparently I got banned for that. Pathetic. LOL.

Edit: NM They banned my whole school's network. I VNCed home and could still post. Odd. Good to know someone on campus got the whole network banned :D

wow, you are rejoicing you fucked your whole campus?

I'd have sympathy for you, but you seem to love yourself being a troll and tend to point it out.