- Jan 29, 2007
- 8,762
- 30
- 91
*Vehicle has been filmed being driven aggressively in the past with flames firing out of its uprated exhaust
*Parked BMW and Mazda 5 worth a fraction of the price also involved in yesterday's accident on Sloane Street
*Lamborghini apparently involved in collision with Mazda, with the supercar then hitting stationary BMW
*Dozens of curious bystanders surrounded Lamborghini to take pictures and film badly-damaged matte black car
he wasn't going that fast...guy pulled out in front of him
The Mazda pulled out in front of him, across 2 lanes. Clearly at fault.
Given that he only ended up like 2-3 car lengths ahead, he was driving maybe 40mph. Certainly not reckless in my book.
To me that video mostly demonstrates how different hypercars are from regular cars in terms of their width, height, visibility and fragility. If that accident had involved even something like a 911, it wouldn't have been nearly as dramatic or damaging. It's intrinsically tricky and risky driving something like an Aventador in traffic, and the stakes are obviously very high because we're talking about repairing a $400K car. I think I would assign the blame for this as about 70-30, with the Mazda primarily at fault, but the only reason that assignment is so critical is the insane fragility and cost of the Aventador. I wouldn't be shocked if it costs $75K to fix that Lambo.
Perhaps you have some retarded driving laws where you live but trust me in London the fault was 100% with the person who pulled across a lane into another one causing someone to hit them. The lambo wasn't speeding or doing anything else illegal so he deserves none of the blame. The cost of his car has nothing to do with anything and the visibility is perfectly adequate to drive safely if people don't pull out on you.
$75k is probably the minimum it will cost to repair the car could easily be £75k.
Are you sure of this? I don't know the speed limit there, but he seemed to be driving pretty fast for the conditions.
He pulled into that lane, because that was the lane he wanted to go into. The other one was the lane going the other way. Still, he came from the right.
But that Lambo is matte black, very wide, and difficult to judge the speed of, and he very much looked to be going too fast. That's a braking distance I have at 50mph, without crashing into anything.
From what little evidence we have, this looks like mutual fault, but then we see neither the run-up of the Lambo or that of the Mazda. With that, it might be easier to understand where the malfunction happened.
In the U.S. you are to pull into the nearest lane to you.
That's madness!
If I turn left, I have have to turn into the lane of oncoming traffic?
That sounds so wrong.
The Mazda pulled out in front of him, across 2 lanes. Clearly at fault.
Given that he only ended up like 2-3 car lengths ahead, he was driving maybe 40mph. Certainly not reckless in my book.
The nearest lane in the direction of the traffic obviously, so left to the lane nearest center, right to the lane farther away from center. This is to minimize retards like the mazda driver, pulling out across the entire road.
That is a two way, two lane road though.
So he pulled into exactly the lane he should have pulled into.