Originally posted by: cliftonite
Pics?
Link to the article? I've heard rumours of this, but nothing confirmed.Originally posted by: gregshin
I have no idea what mercury was thinking...but the 2004 mercury maurder is the last year for these ugly mofos.
On a different note i cant wait to see the new GTOs.....now if buick only decided to bring back the grand nationals.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You like the new GTO and think that the Marauder was ugly? That last line of your sig must really be accurate.
ZV
Originally posted by: gregshin
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You like the new GTO and think that the Marauder was ugly? That last line of your sig must really be accurate.
ZV
GTO looks good...the maurder look like your momma...just plain WHACK
You mean, rather than the whim of the minority that still wants these big ugly boats?Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Originally posted by: Soybomb
Lol it looks just like the grand marquis and crown vic.......
"We've replace their usual grand marquis with a highly overpriced yet nearly identical marauder....lets see if they notice."
Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Wow really!?! Christ man of course they're the same but should still expect some differences in the models. It has an insanely jacked up price and it looks practically identical. Other manufactueres would give different shaped body panels, maybe a vent on the hood, somehting like that. Same car but you can make them look a little more different than new wheels and dual exhaust.Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
Originally posted by: Soybomb
Lol it looks just like the grand marquis and crown vic.......
"We've replace their usual grand marquis with a highly overpriced yet nearly identical marauder....lets see if they notice."
Uh do you not know anything? A Marauder is a Grand Marquis/Crown Vic
It's a freakin' toy! No room under the hood for anything but the wimpy 4.6L. Screw that. Ford makes monster engines that would be perfect, but they won't fit! Pot hole filled American roads, and wide open freeways are best navigated in a FULL SIZED car. This thing barely even fills the bill at that! Pathetic...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Dude... the Maruader is huge. If it were the size of 60s boats it would be freaking huge, like longer than a Suburban. How is that practical? What does that have to do with engine size??? Last time I checked, a V8 was the same length as an I4, and being RWD there is plenty of room under that massive hood.
That's quite odd. 4.6L of displacement could make hundreds of lb-ft of torque.Originally posted by: Ornery
It's a freakin' toy! No room under the hood for anything but the wimpy 4.6L. Screw that. Ford makes monster engines that would be perfect, but they won't fit! Pot hole filled American roads, and wide open freeways are best navigated in a FULL SIZED car. This thing barely even fills the bill at that! Pathetic...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Dude... the Maruader is huge. If it were the size of 60s boats it would be freaking huge, like longer than a Suburban. How is that practical? What does that have to do with engine size??? Last time I checked, a V8 was the same length as an I4, and being RWD there is plenty of room under that massive hood.
Originally posted by: Howard
That's quite odd. 4.6L of displacement could make hundreds of lb-ft of torque.Originally posted by: Ornery
It's a freakin' toy! No room under the hood for anything but the wimpy 4.6L. Screw that. Ford makes monster engines that would be perfect, but they won't fit! Pot hole filled American roads, and wide open freeways are best navigated in a FULL SIZED car. This thing barely even fills the bill at that! Pathetic...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Ornery
No kidding. I'd MUCH rather have a nondescript, little Japanese coupe.![]()
Ford blew it when the downsized the car to the point where they couldn't put a decent engine in it. Serves 'em right for following the whims of our econobox loving consumers.
Dude... the Maruader is huge. If it were the size of 60s boats it would be freaking huge, like longer than a Suburban. How is that practical? What does that have to do with engine size??? Last time I checked, a V8 was the same length as an I4, and being RWD there is plenty of room under that massive hood.