Texas to conduct a lawful audit of election

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gothuevos

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2010
1,886
1,641
136
Hey Import, here's one of your gang .....

"Pro-Trump Congressional Candidate Says 'Audit All 50 states' and 'Execute All Involved'"


Things seem to be escalating at an exponential rate now, much faster than the buildup to 1/6 in the couple of months after the election.

Every day I think of the David Frum quote...every damn day...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

tweaker2

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,537
6,970
136
Trump and his bakers are playing a losing hand, they know it and are trying to bluff their way by raising the stakes higher and higher while everyone knows they're bluffing.



Should'a cut their losses, folded and went for the next deal. But ohhhhh no, Trump begged'um to keep backing his bluff and now the dealer is being accused of cheating Trump by sliding him bum cards to play with. Trump's backers are backing his bluff with cold hard cash in order for Trump to play his bluff BUT, as previously mentioned, the other players knows he's holding shit cards to begin with. Stack's getting higher and higher, his backers are in with him to the end with no way to recoup what's on the table, unless of course, he gets his stooges in the rule making committee to change the rules.



Sucks to be them.
 

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
8,846
11,314
146
Hey Import, here's one of your gang .....
"Pro-Trump Congressional Candidate Says 'Audit All 50 states' and 'Execute All Involved'"
Jerome Bell fell out the top of the idiot tree and hit every branch on the way down. Much like taj.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,107
2,174
136
No, what it proves is how infrequently the crime/crimes are prosecuted. Compare them to shoplifting prosecutions in San Francisco. Just because there's no prosecutions, doesn't mean there's no crime.

no

in my post I linked what butch1 was talking about. There is a column that indicates the status of the case.

so again you are incorrect
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
Hey Import, here's one of your gang .....

"Pro-Trump Congressional Candidate Says 'Audit All 50 states' and 'Execute All Involved'"

I'm no more responsible for idiot things someone says than your are when the leftists say idiotic things or when Antifa punches out an elderly lady.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,056
27,785
136
To make a point Democrats in every state Republicans did an audit they should pass a bill for their own audit and have the taxpayers foot that bill as well. After all we can't have audits done by just one side.

Let's see if the Governors and Republican legislators vote it down.

How many recounts and audits does it take to kill the big lie? Let's just keep having them until those states go broke.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,224
14,912
136
I'm no more responsible for idiot things someone says than your are when the leftists say idiotic things or when Antifa punches out an elderly lady.

But you are responsible for all the lies and bull shit you post here.

Btw, thanks for leaving this country worse than when you came in to it, you were apart of that. You’ll die with no remorse but it doesn’t change the horrible legacy you’ve left behind. A traitor, a liar, a hypocrite, and anti democratic, is how you’ll be remembered, that’s your legacy, enjoy.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,528
5,045
136
No, what it proves is how infrequently the crime/crimes are prosecuted. Compare them to shoplifting prosecutions in San Francisco. Just because there's no prosecutions, doesn't mean there's no crime.

Then why have years of Republican administrations searching nationwide for voter fraud cases don’t seem able to find but a handful each presidential election cycle? (Think 2000-2005, GWB and his five year search that prosecuted 84 prosecutions for voter fraud out of over 100M votes cast.)

Democrats just too smart for Repubs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
No, what it proves is how infrequently the crime/crimes are prosecuted. Compare them to shoplifting prosecutions in San Francisco. Just because there's no prosecutions, doesn't mean there's no crime.
Never said there was "no crime", just that it's a few individuals here and there on both sides, not enough to affect the election either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
No, what it proves is how infrequently the crime/crimes are prosecuted. Compare them to shoplifting prosecutions in San Francisco. Just because there's no prosecutions, doesn't mean there's no crime.

To indulge your argument, try adding a zero to the numbers, or even TWO zeros to the numbers. So assume 100 get away with it for every 1 who is caught. Then you might have, what, 10 bad votes in each state per election?

There's no way to massage those numbers to where they prove what you want to prove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie and Vic

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,049
7,976
136
No, what it proves is how infrequently the crime/crimes are prosecuted. Compare them to shoplifting prosecutions in San Francisco. Just because there's no prosecutions, doesn't mean there's no crime.


Well it's true that the Republicans engage relentlessly in electoral fraud, as you and your pals are doing right now with all the bogus 'rigged election' claims. For some reason you don't get prosecuted though. Are you going to turn yourself in?
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,262
19,751
136
Taj is the moral, ethical and logical equivalent of excrement.

Flood the zone with shit. He is that literal shit.

It's as simple as that. The carriers of the propaganda are shit.

Stop responding to literal crap. Crap is not capable of rational arguments.
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,224
14,912
136
To indulge your argument, try adding a zero to the numbers, or even TWO zeros to the numbers. So assume 100 get away with it for every 1 who is caught. Then you might have, what, 10 bad votes in each state per election?

There's no way to massage those numbers to where they prove what you want to prove.

When you don’t believe in democracy
it’s pretty easy to discredit its outcomes and when you are a traitor like taj it then becomes your goal to delegitimize it. He doesn’t care about your facts because he doesn’t care about democracy.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
To make a point Democrats in every state Republicans did an audit they should pass a bill for their own audit and have the taxpayers foot that bill as well. After all we can't have audits done by just one side.

Let's see if the Governors and Republican legislators vote it down.

How many recounts and audits does it take to kill the big lie? Let's just keep having them until those states go broke.
I agree, audits should be done routinely and by both sides.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
To indulge your argument, try adding a zero to the numbers, or even TWO zeros to the numbers. So assume 100 get away with it for every 1 who is caught. Then you might have, what, 10 bad votes in each state per election?

There's no way to massage those numbers to where they prove what you want to prove.
Some elections in districts are so close they're decided by a coin flip. Just a single fraudulent vote can change the outcome of an election.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
Then why have years of Republican administrations searching nationwide for voter fraud cases don’t seem able to find but a handful each presidential election cycle? (Think 2000-2005, GWB and his five year search that prosecuted 84 prosecutions for voter fraud out of over 100M votes cast.)

Democrats just too smart for Repubs?
You are leaving out other cases, such as the disputed 2008 Senatorial election in Minnesota that got sexual predator Al Franken "elected" who later resigned in disgrace.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi
Mar 11, 2004
23,075
5,557
146
Taj is the moral, ethical and logical equivalent of excrement.

Flood the zone with shit. He is that literal shit.

It's as simple as that. The carriers of the propaganda are shit.

Stop responding to literal crap. Crap is not capable of rational arguments.

It does astonish me how some people seem to believe that smearing turds who are seeking to be smeared is somehow effective at preventing the smearing of turds.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
When you don’t believe in democracy
it’s pretty easy to discredit its outcomes and when you are a traitor like taj it then becomes your goal to delegitimize it. He doesn’t care about your facts because he doesn’t care about democracy.
I believe in the Constitution, which if you could grasp it means we're a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. Constitutional Republics are all about checks and balances, such as voting audits to check the accuracy and validity of elections.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi and JD50

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
Some elections in districts are so close they're decided by a coin flip. Just a single fraudulent vote can change the outcome of an election.

Then all of the bad votes would have to be in the same state and district. And all of them would have to be bad votes favoring the same candide. And that's after we added 2 zeroes to the known number. From what I found, the closest margin ever in a U.S. Congressional district is 94 votes. So even those assumptions do not work. Like I said, no way to massage this.
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,224
14,912
136
I believe in the Constitution, which if you could grasp it means we're a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. Constitutional Republics are all about checks and balances, such as voting audits to check the accuracy and validity of elections.

Ahahhahaahhaaa!!!!!

Holy fuck! That has to be the self own for the year!

A constitutional republic is a type of democracy you fucking moron!

Let’s see you go 0 for 2 and show us all where in the constitution (I’ll even give you the advantage of pointing to a state constitution) where election integrity is to be conducted by partisan groups, if at all.

How long shall we wait for a reply, traitor?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
I believe in the Constitution, which if you could grasp it means we're a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. Constitutional Republics are all about checks and balances, such as voting audits to check the accuracy and validity of elections.

Feel free to quote the article, section, and clause of the Constitution that allows a single political party to harvest private voter data exclusively in jurisdictions with opposition party majorities.
Meanwhile, the checks and balances in the Constitution refers to the powers vested in 3 different branches of govt, and not to the illegal partisanship corruption and voter suppression that you're endorsing here.
 
Last edited: