I wonder how Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson would feel about outlawing interracial marriage.
I'm in Australia, so I don't have a good understanding of the American political 'possibilities'.
In a hypothetical Trump win in 2024, is it possible that a future Trump administration to pursue enablers of the 'stolen election' and charge them with treason?
If he is able to fully corrupt the DOJ and has the backing of the house and senate. It’s highly unlikely but if it did happen you’d have rioting all over the country and America would be a banana republic at that point.
I wonder how Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson would feel about outlawing interracial marriage.
It's the attitude of every conservative everywhere. The primary theme of every conservative policy, law, or moral stance is that it doesn't affect them, or they believe it won't affect them. They attempt to fuck over everyone and everything around them to make themselves feel less impotent in comparison.Someone here quoted (of which I've probably misquoted) "Laws are for thee and not for me" seems to be the attitude that the conservative aristocrat class have managed to normalize. It seems to have also infected the Repub party in general where cheating and rigging elections is OK for them, especially the part where they now believe that any election they lose was guaranteed rigged against them, giving them the lame excuse to "justify" their rigging things the other way around.
It's their same stance when it comes to crime. They are cool with the Jan 6 attempted coup yet get their panties in a knot over smash and grabs. As long as the "right people" are the perps they are on board with crime.It's the attitude of every conservative everywhere. The primary theme of every conservative policy, law, or moral stance is that it doesn't affect them, or they believe it won't affect them. They attempt to fuck over everyone and everything around them to make themselves feel less impotent in comparison.
The big stumbling block would surely be the complete-and-utter absence of any evidence of such a 'steal'?
What kind of false optimism leads you to believe this matters one bit to the GOP?
But it's not the GOP that would be doing the investigating or making the legal judgements. I _am_ sufficiently optimistic to believe it would matter to the employees of the DoJ. That's my point - if the rot were to go so far as to corrupt the US state apparatus right down to the level of "frontline" DoJ investigators, then the US really would be doomed.
Politically and rhetorically, maybe the Republicans would make use of the mere fact of such an investigation being instigated, and would distort and lie about any findings. But it all assumes Trump could win in '24 anyway, and I don't believe he will. I think he's a busted-flush at this point. Another Republican reprobate might take his place, though.
Like I said.... false optimism. (fwiw I hope you're correct!)
What would it take for people to start claiming to miss Trump? Probably need to imagine that, and then start worrying.
Nearly half of America is already there.
There is no bottom. It just gets darker the deeper you go.Well, point taken, but I meant Democrats saying that (as they've occasionally done about Dubya once Trump came along). The Republicans keep finding new bottoms to the barrel. It's particularly odd how there seems to be a sort of evolutionary-pressure on them to become progressively worse at English speech.
That will be #1 on the list. Exposing a narcissist is dangerous.I'm in Australia, so I don't have a good understanding of the American political 'possibilities'.
In a hypothetical Trump win in 2024, is it possible that a future Trump administration to pursue enablers of the 'stolen election' and charge them with treason?