Originally posted by: senseamp
Didn't Dems win the TX statehouse? Time to do redistricting 2.0![]()
Uh - make that 3.0. These districts had been gerrymandered long before the latest redistricting.
Originally posted by: senseamp
Didn't Dems win the TX statehouse? Time to do redistricting 2.0![]()
Originally posted by: senseamp
Didn't Dems win the TX statehouse? Time to do redistricting 2.0![]()
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: senseamp
Didn't Dems win the TX statehouse? Time to do redistricting 2.0![]()
NO, they took back 6 seats, but they are still in the minority. Which i guess this shows not all the districts are locked up as tight fr republicans as the democrats are saying.
Originally posted by: techs
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006//pages/results/states/TX/index.html
I am looking for the actual vote totals of Democrat and Republicans state wide.
However, the mere fact that 76 percent of the seats went to Republicans shows how unfair the re-districting was. No way the Republicans got even 60 percent of the vote.
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
The Republicans have skewed the voting tremendously by their Gerrymandering. It makes a mockery of this country that they have done this and that the courts have allowed it. The districts should be divided by population in a non-partisan manner, evenly and unbiased.
C'mon - both parties have been equally guilty over the years of doing the exact same thing across the country.
It seems like there would be some method of assimilating counties based on their population to roughly be equal, and then use county lines as the borders of the congressional districts. They could add/subtract counties as needed based on each decade's census. I guess that makes too much sense, though.
