Texas DA Apparently Ensured Execution of an Innocent Man

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,153
6,317
126
Sure, go argue your opinion in the Boston Marathon Bomber guilty thread and tell everyone about how disgusting it is. Because it's important to ensure that people who commit terrorism, piracy, and genocide have a nice long comfortable life. Hell, even Subyman disagrees with you on this one and thinks the death penalty is appropriate.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37313919&postcount=46

We will kill you if you kill folk you think deserve to die because you will deserve to die and then we will pretend we're different than you. You have no right to decide who deserves to die, we do. We pretend to be different by calling it legal. It's just fine if we kill people so long as we hurd up like little cowards. You don't get to feel the satisfaction of killing people who deserve to die, we do.

The thinking of idiots.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
And Rick Perry thinks he can be president.

t3Ld3Co.gif


How Rick Scott is still the Governor of FL beyond me.

A lot of the country were Rick rolled awhile back it seems to me.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,090
136
Sure, go argue your opinion in the Boston Marathon Bomber guilty thread and tell everyone about how disgusting it is. Because it's important to ensure that people who commit terrorism, piracy, and genocide have a nice long comfortable life. Hell, even Subyman disagrees with you on this one and thinks the death penalty is appropriate.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37313919&postcount=46
He's being a bit tongue in cheek. I do not support death for Tsarnaev, despite personal feelings wanting vengeance and punishment.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
He's being a bit tongue in cheek. I do not support death for Tsarnaev, despite personal feelings wanting vengeance and punishment.

Because super max prison solitary confinement 23 hours a day is considered a comfortable life. Glenn's life must be rough if that is comfortable.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Because super max prison solitary confinement 23 hours a day is considered a comfortable life. Glenn's life must be rough if that is comfortable.

There's plenty of folks pretty committed to the cause and I'm sure they'd consider a life in jail a reasonable trade-off if they could accomplish their goals. You have guys ready and willing to suicide bomb if they could kill a few Jews, I'm sure they'll be truly punished by sitting in jail having to think about what they did because after conviction they'll surely feel remorse. Oh the torture of having to recall how you killed your hated enemies and watched them suffer while you raped their women, that will surely be having them cry "Out, damn'd spot!" in no time.


But who am I kidding, you'd be the guy to wave off an outright confession and hundreds of witnesses because hey, the guy could still be innocent right? Who's counting a few genocides between friends if it somehow makes us look more "civilized" after all.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
They'd ruminate on their glory in a dark cell away from free society (a society which saved money by sitting them there instead of executing them.) Who cares what they think about? The reason for the prison systems is to protect us.

Oh no, are we doing this again? :eek:
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,877
36,871
136
There's plenty of folks pretty committed to the cause and I'm sure they'd consider a life in jail a reasonable trade-off if they could accomplish their goals. You have guys ready and willing to suicide bomb if they could kill a few Jews, I'm sure they'll be truly punished by sitting in jail having to think about what they did because after conviction they'll surely feel remorse. Oh the torture of having to recall how you killed your hated enemies and watched them suffer while you raped their women, that will surely be having them cry "Out, damn'd spot!" in no time.


But who am I kidding, you'd be the guy to wave off an outright confession and hundreds of witnesses because hey, the guy could still be innocent right? Who's counting a few genocides between friends if it somehow makes us look more "civilized" after all.

How many US citizens have been indicted on charges of genocide over the last say 50 years?

Straw. Man.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Prosecutors need to have leeway and protection to their jobs, but in this case the guy seems to have gone far beyond doing his job and into negligence territory. Given the evidence that showed his misconduct that ended up leading to the execution of a possibly innocent man, I'd say charges of negligent homicide against the DA are justified.

Won't happen though, the Texas criminal justice system is really messed up.

I wouldn't say it was negligence. that hints at least that the guy just made a mistake.

no. what happened was murder. he knew the guy was innocent. he had evidence of that. He refused to show it to anyone and let the man die.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
How many US citizens have been indicted on charges of genocide over the last say 50 years?

Straw. Man.

Yup, here in IL without the death penalty we are having genocides weekly.