Tesla contributed ‘more than $5 billion’ to California’s economy and supported over 51,000 jobs

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
I have a reservation for a model 3 but they won't let you configure with AWD yet so I'm still waiting. My 2015 model S is 90D is getting a bit long in the tooth. Definitely could use a better infotainment system and I still have the crappy Mobileye AP1 hardware (new teslas get Nvidia Drive PX with AP2 and Full self-driving).
 

bigi

Platinum Member
Aug 8, 2001
2,490
156
106

Yuriman

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2004
5,530
141
106
I have a reservation for a model 3 but they won't let you configure with AWD yet so I'm still waiting. My 2015 model S is 90D is getting a bit long in the tooth. Definitely could use a better infotainment system and I still have the crappy Mobileye AP1 hardware (new teslas get Nvidia Drive PX with AP2 and Full self-driving).

Is a Model 3 really going to be an upgrade over a P90D?
 

tweakmonkey

Senior member
Mar 11, 2013
728
32
91
tweak3d.net
I can attest to how many people Tesla's got working there: my job is based about 1 mile from their factory in Fremont. Every restaurant is packed for hours now. Traffic near the factory is insane. And I work in the automotive sector (Porsches)... nearly every fabricator or service I use relating to cars does work with Tesla now. Quite a few of our customers work for Tesla, and many other customers drive their cars (we've even sold some expensive wheels for Teslas).

Tesla just built a massive factory in Reno. They're also adding something like 5 million sq-ft to their factory in Fremont to scale up for future models. And they've got 1000s of engineers and programmers at the current factory working on new stuff for the future. How is it surprising that they're not making a profit yet? They're investing and betting on their growth and new technology, in an extremely high-overhead industry. If they wanted to stick to being a small company and focus on their profits, they would've done that. Instead they're trying to flip the industry on its head and clearly have some long term plans.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
Is a Model 3 really going to be an upgrade over a P90D?

It's just a 90D, not a P model.

The model 3 has better self-driving hardware (7 cameras vs 1, 2Tflop Nvidia Drive PX vs 250Glfop Mobileye junk). It has better motors (non-inductive). It is easier to repair and stronger (steel vs aluminum body).

The only disadvantages are a slight reduction in power/handling and size of screen and interior materials.

If I had a Model X or a P100D then yeah it would be a downgrade. Bear in mind I will be buying the performance AWD version with all the amenities (total ~70k).
 

Yuriman

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2004
5,530
141
106
Makes sense.

Aluminum is a huge advantage in Vermont. Steel cars start to rust to pieces after 5 years. I drive around a nearly 20 year old aluminum vehicle and am thankful for it every time it has a salt bath. Plus, it's something like 5-700lbs lighter than an equivalent steel vehicle, and has higher chassis rigidity.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,921
5,560
136
It's just a 90D, not a P model.

The model 3 has better self-driving hardware (7 cameras vs 1, 2Tflop Nvidia Drive PX vs 250Glfop Mobileye junk). It has better motors (non-inductive). It is easier to repair and stronger (steel vs aluminum body).

The only disadvantages are a slight reduction in power/handling and size of screen and interior materials.

If I had a Model X or a P100D then yeah it would be a downgrade. Bear in mind I will be buying the performance AWD version with all the amenities (total ~70k).

Yeah. I'm holding out for the Model Y myself...I like the crossover design over sedans for functionality (although the 3 looks great!) & I figure by the time it comes out, Autopilot will be a lot more polished.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
Elon says the performance AWD version will do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and beat an M3 at the track. Configuration starts in July.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/998084314200862720

Makes sense.

Aluminum is a huge advantage in Vermont. Steel cars start to rust to pieces after 5 years. I drive around a nearly 20 year old aluminum vehicle and am thankful for it every time it has a salt bath. Plus, it's something like 5-700lbs lighter than an equivalent steel vehicle, and has higher chassis rigidity.

Aluminum would be the ideal material due to lack of corrosion and strength to weight but it costs SO much to repair a model S with all-aluminum construction that I don't think it is feasible to construct a consumer car for 35k that uses that construction.

Yeah. I'm holding out for the Model Y myself...I like the crossover design over sedans for functionality (although the 3 looks great!) & I figure by the time it comes out, Autopilot will be a lot more polished.


Model Y reveal should be coming this year, should be interesting to see what they come up with styling-wise. I actually was not a huge fan of the Model S styling (even though I bought the car) but the 3 looks amazing, IMO better than the S.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
That's insane. 3.5 seconds is bananas! Pricey though...

It's supposed to compete with the M3. I agree 78k is steep but my model S was substantially more than that and it only does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds.


The non-performance AWD Model 3 will do it 4.5 seconds and it's only 5k more than the regular 3 LR
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaido

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,921
5,560
136
It's supposed to compete with the M3. I agree 78k is steep but my model S was substantially more than that and it only does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds.


The non-performance AWD Model 3 will do it 4.5 seconds and it's only 5k more than the regular 3 LR

Looks like $86,000 for a fully-loaded Model 3, configured with every single option available ($78k Performance Model 3 + $5k Autopilot + $3k FSD). Some price calculations from reddit:
  • $35k - Base Model 3 with RWD (range: 220 miles, 0-60: 5.6sec, top: 130 mph)
  • $9k - Long-range battery (range: 310 miles, 0-60: 5.1sec, top: 140mph)
  • $5k - Premium Upgrade (heated seats, premium materials, sound system, etc.
  • $5k - Enhanced Autopilot (Model 3 will match speed to traffic conditions, keep within a lane, automatically change lanes, transition from one freeway to another, exit the freeway and self-park at your destination)
  • $3k - Full self-driving (future features; requires Enhanced Autopilot; $4k if purchased after delivery, so you save a grand pre-ordering it)
  • $1.5k - 19" Sports wheels
  • $1k - Paint (anything other than black costs $1,000: dark silver, light silver, blue, pearl white multi-coat, red multicoat)
  • $5k - Dual Motor AWD (310 miles, 0-60: 4.5sec, top: 140mph)
  • $21.5k (does this price include the $9k LR battery & AWD?) - Performance upgrade (310 miles, 0-60: 3.5sec, top: 155mph)
Performance levels: (0 to 60)
  • 5.6 seconds = Base RWD Model 3
  • 5.1 seconds = Long-range battery
  • 4.5 seconds = Dual motor AWD
  • 3.5 seconds = Performance upgrade
 
Last edited:
Mar 11, 2004
23,356
5,780
146
5B into CA , they hire 400 a week, Arizona is happy too as they have GigaFactory there.

https://electrek.co/2018/05/15/tesla-california-economic-contribution-report/

Can't wait to get Model 3.

Er, their Gigafactory is in Nevada.

Meh, normal if you expand exponentially. Money 101 really.

Nobody's bitching about 50B given to GM (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2014/04/30/taxpayers-gm-bailout-losses/8522681/) and others due to their real unprofitability.

Let's come back here in a few and see.

What the...there was a LOT of bitching about that. You do realize without that bailout, its possible Tesla would've been f'ed too, right? Ford and Toyota both petitioned the government to bail out GM and Chrysler because them going under would have taken a lot of suppliers out as well, which would have led to Ford and Toyota possibly following suit. Not to mention, without government help, Tesla would still be looking for some way to enter production of the Model S (they got a big DOE loan, and then lucked out that GM and Toyota were abandoning the NUMMI plant, giving Tesla a cheap space to setup shop so they could then put most of the money towards building the Gigafactory, which is kinda important for them being successful).
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,223
136
Er, their Gigafactory is in Nevada.



What the...there was a LOT of bitching about that. You do realize without that bailout, its possible Tesla would've been f'ed too, right? Ford and Toyota both petitioned the government to bail out GM and Chrysler because them going under would have taken a lot of suppliers out as well, which would have led to Ford and Toyota possibly following suit. Not to mention, without government help, Tesla would still be looking for some way to enter production of the Model S (they got a big DOE loan, and then lucked out that GM and Toyota were abandoning the NUMMI plant, giving Tesla a cheap space to setup shop so they could then put most of the money towards building the Gigafactory, which is kinda important for them being successful).

Don't forget, at this same time, Ford arranged a line of credit to be in place from the gov't....just never accessed/used it like GM and Chrysler did.

And from what I understand, Ford damned near had to use the approved gov't credit/bailout funds.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Elon says the performance AWD version will do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and beat an M3 at the track.

I don't believe that for a second. At the dragstrip, most likely. But throw in some curves and no way is the model 3 beating the M3. Not unless there is a serious upgrade to the suspension system available in the Model 3.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
I don't believe that for a second. At the dragstrip, most likely. But throw in some curves and no way is the model 3 beating the M3. Not unless there is a serious upgrade to the suspension system available in the Model 3.

M3 is dinosaur tech. Very high center of gravity compared to Model 3, less power.


Even the regular 3 LR dynos @ 340whp. The performance version will be easily 470whp and probably 500+. The US has straight roads so not sure why you care how the car preforms on a track anyway. Nobody is taking their US M3 to the Nurburgring lol.
 

mindless1

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2001
8,430
1,598
126
The US has straight roads so not sure why you care how the car preforms on a track anyway. Nobody is taking their US M3 to the Nurburgring lol.

Flat areas of the US have straight roads. The rest not so much.