Telescope Finds Big Bang Evidence

mithrandir2001

Diamond Member
May 1, 2001
6,545
1
0
By Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News Online science editor

Scientists have made a discovery that represents an important confirmation of the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe.
Almost 5,500 hours of observations by a radio telescope at the South Pole have shown the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) to be polarised.

The CMB has been called the afterglow of the Big Bang. It is radiation that comes from all directions in space and has its origin when the cosmos was just 400,000 years old.

The polarisation can be used to probe conditions in the early Universe. Cosmologists say although such an effect was expected they are relieved to find it.

The discovery should open a new era of cosmic measurements and understanding.

Prediction 'bang on'

The discovery was made by the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (Dasi) at the Amundsen-Scott base at the South Pole. It makes observations of the sky in microwaves.

The CMB has transfixed astronomers since it was discovered in 1965 by radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson.

Detailed observations of it can reveal clues about the structure and evolution of the cosmos.

The CMB is difficult to study from the ground: many of the better observations of it have been made from satellites.

On Earth, the South Pole is a good place to look at it as the local atmosphere lacks the water vapour that obscures the CMB at other places on the Earth's surface.

Faint detail in the CMB has been seen before but Dr Carlstrom of Chicago University, US, says mapping its polarisation has the potential of obtaining much more information, "like going from a black-and-white to colour".

'Preposterous Universe'

"It's going to triple the amount of information that we get from the CMB," says researcher John Kovac.

"The prediction is bang on," says Dr Carlstrom. "We think we know the Universe, but if the polarisation was not there at the predicted level we were back to the drawing board."

However, the new observations are pointing to an ever-more puzzling Universe: a Universe whose birth was dominated by mysterious dark matter and dark energy.

"We're stuck with a preposterous Universe," he says.

The observations confirm the inflation theory of the early evolution of the Universe, which describes an explosive spurt of expansion when the Universe was young.

"We can go from checking inflation to actually testing it," Dr Carlstrom adds.

The next step astronomers say is to achieve a tenfold increase in instrumental sensitivity that is required to detect the signature of inflation in the CMB. Only then will they have detected definite proof of cosmic inflation.

Story Link
 

Legendary

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2002
7,019
1
0
Interesting...something more for my arsenal to defend myself against christians who attempt to turn me to their ways. Thanks.
P.S. the above was not a bashing of christians. not every christian attempts to force his faith on everyone. it happens to me sometimes so i'm glad to have information to back up my claims.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Legendary
Interesting...something more for my arsenal to defend myself against christians who attempt to turn me to their ways. Thanks. P.S. the above was not a bashing of christians. not every christian attempts to force his faith on everyone. it happens to me sometimes so i'm glad to have information to back up my claims.

BTW not every Christian has a problem with the Big Bang. I have some however, at least as proposed in most theories. Technical stuff. Anyway, I am reasonable sure there was a Big Event. Report was interesting in any event.
 

Ameesh

Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
23,686
1
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Legendary
Interesting...something more for my arsenal to defend myself against christians who attempt to turn me to their ways. Thanks. P.S. the above was not a bashing of christians. not every christian attempts to force his faith on everyone. it happens to me sometimes so i'm glad to have information to back up my claims.

BTW not every Christian has a problem with the Big Bang. I have some however, at least as proposed in most theories. Technical stuff. Anyway, I am reasonable sure there was a Big Event. Report was interesting in any event.

what technical thing in paticular?
 

Maetryx

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2001
4,849
1
81
Creationists should be reassured by evidence of the Big Bang. The atheistic scientists of the 1930s were horrified to find out that the universe had a definite Beginning.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Ameesh
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Legendary Interesting...something more for my arsenal to defend myself against christians who attempt to turn me to their ways. Thanks. P.S. the above was not a bashing of christians. not every christian attempts to force his faith on everyone. it happens to me sometimes so i'm glad to have information to back up my claims.
BTW not every Christian has a problem with the Big Bang. I have some however, at least as proposed in most theories. Technical stuff. Anyway, I am reasonable sure there was a Big Event. Report was interesting in any event.
what technical thing in paticular?

Well, what we observe is not the big bang, but the point where the universe cooled enough for it to be transparent to radiation. That is postulated to be at around 400,000 years after the beginning. Before that is a mystery and we suffer from a prodigous lack of encumbrence of data. Singularities offer a few problems in how they could inflate. I am using the commonly accepted reasoning of a quantum fluctuation of immense proportions in de Sitter space. There are therories that posit a different mechanism. One that looks promising is a membrane solution that could lead to an oscillating universe. This presupposes the existance of negative energy, which would lead to antigravity fueling an accelerating expansion over time. Some of this will be cleared if experiments in the works can determine if the fine structure constant has changed over the life of the universe. In the standard big bang this in invariant. Also, the BB does not explain why matter is dominant over antimatter. A few other things too.

I have been around almost as long as Red Dawn (this ought to get a rise ;) ) That is long enough to know that almost if not everything I know is wrong. Remember the Big Bang is a hypothesis designed to fit the facts, and could be turned on its head in a century.

Anyway, that's a few things.