Amused
Elite Member
- Apr 14, 2001
- 56,541
- 16,324
- 146
Nope. You thought you were clever citing an article I already linked and now you have to backtrack.
I summarized it, so yes
It is a strong indicator of his father’s abuse of power, which would explain the slap on the wrist for two felonies that would have otherwise been more severe in terms of consequences.
No, are you?
A 3rd party is what brought it to light and the Stock Act was crystal clear in its intent.
I’ve not quoted any right wing sources or narratives. The snopes article speaks for itself.
Why yes, it does. Did you even fucking READ IT???
Because it clearly says this:
The furniture store: Beto was clearly and demonstrably not involved in the running of that business. Irrelevant.
His dad's car: Beto was 10 years old. Irrelevant.
Insider trading: No, it wasn't. He self reported an ethics violation prohibiting participation in IPOs. He didn't know about the ethics rule and made amends as soon as he found out. It isn't even classified as "insider trading" by ANYONE outside of right-wing propaganda.
The self pwnage in this conversation is STILL amazing.
