techspotSimCity Benchmark GPU

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
898
594
136
http://www.techspot.com/review/648-simcity-performance/

2560x1600 the GeForce GTX Titan takes the lead averaging 40fps. This is 2fps faster than the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition and 3fps faster than the GTX 680. For acceptable performance at these settings gamers will want at least a GeForce GTX 660 Ti or Radeon HD 7950

rM4zt3I.png


Rz63FvP.png


pjQ9O5d.jpg
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,065
418
126
I had no idea this game was so demanding...

but why go with DX9 for a 2013 PC only game? :|
windows xp?
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,329
126
Any CPU benches ? Looks like CPU bottlenecking when looking at the top 4 or 5 cards.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
I had no idea this game was so demanding...

but why go with DX9 for a 2013 PC only game? :|
windows xp?

Its not. My GF and I play it. And I sit back with a huge...?? On the benchmark table.

SimCity is also very unsuited for benchmark. You cant save, you might have 1000 cars on the street and air polution 60 seconds later.

Same for CPU performance. Utterly terrible benchmark.
 
Last edited:

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
Nope. No matter how much you overclock you won't match a stock Titan. At least not at 1600p. A 7970ghz oc at most equals it and that is the most you can dream of at 1250+ 1500+
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,605
6
81
These results are rubbish. From the looks of it it's neither a CPU nor a GPU bottleneck, which is impossible.
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,605
6
81
I still find it unlikely. If a game is poorly coded, it's either CPU or GPU resources that it needs to run properly.
 

Olikan

Platinum Member
Sep 23, 2011
2,023
275
126
to tell the truth,
i can't see how going from 30 fps to 80 in a game like SimCity, really matters

but at the same time, i haven't bought it :p
 

tipoo

Senior member
Oct 4, 2012
245
7
81
Interesting. I had no idea it would be that GPU intensive, I thought it would be more on the CPU side but it appears to hammer both.

I'd be interested in seeing low setting results for playing on laptops and such away from home.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Its a crushing game with maxed settings and big cities. Which is always the case in these types of games, so it should not be a surprise.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
I can get this game to bring my system to a crawl. And its all dependent on the lighting setting. With it on Ultra, and a city of 250k, I dip into the low 20's at time. Turn lighting to medium and my FPS will shoot up to 50 or so.
 

-Slacker-

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2010
1,563
0
76
Again, the FX-8350 scales very well with increased clock speed. This architecture is highly dependent on clock speed, right? At least, that's what I remember reading in the Bulldozer threads back in 2011...
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
Again, the FX-8350 scales very well with increased clock speed. This architecture is highly dependent on clock speed, right? At least, that's what I remember reading in the Bulldozer threads back in 2011...

The 8350 is Piledriver, but it does scale well with clock. Piledriver has a better IPC than Bulldozer, but still not close to Intel really. But it is a chip that is totally worth over clocking as you do gain a lot from it.
 

Yuriman

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2004
5,530
141
106
This is yet another game where you can drop shadows one notch and get a 25-50% performance boost, making this perfectly smooth on a 7850. I'm not saying it doesn't look better on max shadows, but the difference is minute and hard to justify several hundred dollars.

*90 hours into Sim City*
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
This is yet another game where you can drop shadows one notch and get a 25-50% performance boost, making this perfectly smooth on a 7850. I'm not saying it doesn't look better on max shadows, but the difference is minute and hard to justify several hundred dollars.

*90 hours into Sim City*

Always been the case, you can get >90% of the IQ of max settings on mid-range setups without buying expensive top GPUs.
 

-Slacker-

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2010
1,563
0
76
The 8350 is Piledriver, but it does scale well with clock. Piledriver has a better IPC than Bulldozer, but still not close to Intel really. But it is a chip that is totally worth over clocking as you do gain a lot from it.

I know, I was referencing bulldozer because the are relatively similar, with wide pipelines, making them both dependent on high clock speeds.