- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,577
- 1,993
- 126
Couple years ago, I read through a white-paper on the use of TEC coolers on the newer Pentium 4 processors (pre-Smithfield). Various measures of thermal resistance, CPU thermal wattage and the wattage needed to drive the TEC cooler suggested that TEC was no longer feasible for CPU cooling.
Primarily, this reflected the fact that while thermal wattage of processors had increased, the areal size of "CPU real-estate" had remained the same or decreased, and that a TEC's effectiveness in cooling was a direct function of contact-surface area size. So at certain wattages, TEC could only enhance other technologies like water-cooling. The converse of that propositiion involved the skyrocketing wattage requirements to power a TEC cooler under this scenario.
Has Core 2 Duo changed the feasibility of using a TEC cooler? Are there recent studies which re-examine TEC as a Core-2-Duo cooling option?
Primarily, this reflected the fact that while thermal wattage of processors had increased, the areal size of "CPU real-estate" had remained the same or decreased, and that a TEC's effectiveness in cooling was a direct function of contact-surface area size. So at certain wattages, TEC could only enhance other technologies like water-cooling. The converse of that propositiion involved the skyrocketing wattage requirements to power a TEC cooler under this scenario.
Has Core 2 Duo changed the feasibility of using a TEC cooler? Are there recent studies which re-examine TEC as a Core-2-Duo cooling option?