Team Anadtech needs more crunchers for DPAD!

[caferace]

That should be fun!

-jim

 

[Assimilator1]

Nice

Btw ,anyone here got a C2D & run the DPAD benchmark?

 

[Amaroque]

I'll run the benchmark on the C2D as soon as I get over there (it was a build for a family member).

Idon't know when that will be though. That's the best I can do.

 

[Assimilator1]

Ok cool

 

[Wolfsraider]

Ok 1 more Asslaminated C2D E6300 added today for the TeAm!

Assimilator1:

I have an E6600 with 2 gb ram I can run it on if you step me thru it, never run that before.

lmk and I will run it for you.

 

[Amaroque]

Originally posted by: Wolfsraider
Ok 1 more Asslaminated C2D E6300 added today for the TeAm!

Assimilator1:

I have an E6600 with 2 gb ram I can run it on if you step me thru it, never run that before.

lmk and I will run it for you.

It's not hard. You just need to go here. You only need to make a user.txt file with something like "TA Wolfsraider" TA needs to be before the user name you want to use. The txt file has to be in the same folder as the client.

The client will automatically use any and all cores available.

-Dustin

 

[Wolfsraider]

I meant the benchmark lol

I have dpad set up on mine already

 

[caferace]

Wolfsraider, grab the muon bench file from here:

http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/muon1bench.exe

Drop it in your DPAD directory, and let it run concurrent with DPAD running for 24 hrs so you get a stable number. It will generate a file called benchcsv.log, which contains the average #of mpts computed for the box. Here is an old one from my FX-55, with a slight OC:

Uptime (secs),Mpts in file,Estimate kpts/sec
2154,14249.4,0.00
2454,14352.4,343.29
2754,14433.0,305.97
3354,14567.2,264.80
3654,14611.9,241.64
6355,15341.1,259.90
6955,15473.7,255.03
8755,15877.3,246.62
9056,15965.1,248.59
11757,16633.8,248.31
13857,17037.4,238.23
14157,17170.7,243.38
14457,17225.8,241.92
14757,17259.4,238.83
15358,17406.7,239.13
15958,17532.1,237.82
17458,18017.2,246.20
17758,18097.7,246.63
18358,18228.2,245.55
18958,18364.1,244.87
19258,18444.8,245.29
21658,19147.9,251.15
21958,19186.1,249.28
23459,19589.5,250.66
23759,19725.7,253.48
24359,19901.2,254.53
24959,20032.5,253.59
25559,20166.7,252.83
27059,20570.0,253.79
27659,20702.6,253.02
29159,21104.8,253.86
29459,21185.5,254.02
30060,21352.3,254.54
30360,21433.1,254.69
30660,21535.2,255.59
30960,21557.6,253.71
31260,21694.4,255.79
31560,21714.5,253.87
31860,21795.2,254.02
32160,21880.5,254.32
32460,21999.9,255.74
33960,22403.1,256.36
34560,22531.2,255.56
36060,22934.7,256.16
36360,23013.4,256.21
36960,23170.1,256.30
37260,23248.0,256.32
37561,23328.9,256.44
39061,23730.5,256.90

The last numbers (i.e... 256.90) give you an idea of what a DPAD boxen produces per hour.

edited because Petrus makes me spell badly. It's infectious.

 

[Amaroque]

Originally posted by: Wolfsraider
I meant the benchmark lol

I have dpad set up on mine already

lol ok!

Maybe the info will be useful to someone!

 

[Wolfsraider]

Originally posted by: caferace
Wolfsraider, grab the muon bench file from here:

http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/muon1bench.exe

Drop it in your DPAD directory, and let it run concurrent with DPAD running for 24 hrs so you get a stable number. It will generate a file called benchcsv.log, which contains the average #of mpts computed for the box. Here is an old one from my FX-55, with a slight OC:

Uptime (secs),Mpts in file,Estimate kpts/sec
2154,14249.4,0.00
2454,14352.4,343.29
2754,14433.0,305.97
3354,14567.2,264.80
3654,14611.9,241.64
6355,15341.1,259.90
6955,15473.7,255.03
8755,15877.3,246.62
9056,15965.1,248.59
11757,16633.8,248.31
13857,17037.4,238.23
14157,17170.7,243.38
14457,17225.8,241.92
14757,17259.4,238.83
15358,17406.7,239.13
15958,17532.1,237.82
17458,18017.2,246.20
17758,18097.7,246.63
18358,18228.2,245.55
18958,18364.1,244.87
19258,18444.8,245.29
21658,19147.9,251.15
21958,19186.1,249.28
23459,19589.5,250.66
23759,19725.7,253.48
24359,19901.2,254.53
24959,20032.5,253.59
25559,20166.7,252.83
27059,20570.0,253.79
27659,20702.6,253.02
29159,21104.8,253.86
29459,21185.5,254.02
30060,21352.3,254.54
30360,21433.1,254.69
30660,21535.2,255.59
30960,21557.6,253.71
31260,21694.4,255.79
31560,21714.5,253.87
31860,21795.2,254.02
32160,21880.5,254.32
32460,21999.9,255.74
33960,22403.1,256.36
34560,22531.2,255.56
36060,22934.7,256.16
36360,23013.4,256.21
36960,23170.1,256.30
37260,23248.0,256.32
37561,23328.9,256.44
39061,23730.5,256.90

The last numbers (i.e... 256.90) give you an idea of what a DPAD boxen produces per hour.

edited because Petrus makes me spell badly. It's infectious.

Sweet ty And its up and running now, I will try to leave the puter alone and not game on it but no promises lol

LOL At Amaroque Its all good i never spell out what i am trying to say Ugh Suprises me that i even get a response sometimes lol

 

[Amaroque]

Let's play!

 

[Wolfsraider]

LOL I meant LOTR Online, its only been a bout 3.5 hours and I am dying to play lol

Besides thats Way too serious play for me I might get 5% of that a day on a great day lol

Quick question, How do I copy /paste ther results from muon benchmark to a text file lol No way am I typing all that out Hee Hee!

 

[Wolfsraider]

Ok I see its benchcsv Sweet nice program lol


So far we have

Uptime (secs),Mpts in file,Estimate kpts/sec
58463,36630.5,0.00
59664,37034.0,336.15
59964,37256.6,417.27
60264,37354.4,402.04
60564,37434.0,382.49
60864,37581.4,396.07
61164,37632.4,370.95
61464,37774.5,381.20
61765,37853.2,370.38
62665,38256.9,387.10
62965,38296.7,370.14
63865,38740.1,390.53
65066,39143.8,380.67
65366,39304.9,387.46
65666,39422.7,387.66
66866,39827.9,380.50
67166,39971.8,383.92
67467,40052.6,380.10
68367,40455.8,386.26
68667,40520.4,381.23
68967,40665.0,384.10
69267,40795.1,385.48
69567,40940.3,388.14
69867,40959.1,379.57
70168,41104.2,382.23
70468,41233.4,383.44
70768,41309.2,380.24
71068,41427.2,380.55
71368,41570.6,382.82

 

[Silverthorne]

You have to make sure sample files downloading is switched off in config.txt for this to work properly.

 

[Wolfsraider]

OOps Ok will try again tonight then

 

[JonB]

Wolfsraider, I've tried it both ways. The update feature just will cause an occasional false high number. I left update on finally and just tossed out some highs and lows. A median value is representative, not to be confused with a mean (or average).

Just for fun, after doing a Text to Columns in Excel, here are your values:

382.655 (median value)
382.8103571 (mean value or Average)

you can see that there isn't much difference, and shouldn't be if the sample size is large enough.

Call it 382 and nobody can argue.

 

[Wolfsraider]

Ok justfor kicks needs another hour 45 min to be 24 hours and dips are Where i was gaming DOH

Uptime (secs),Mpts in file,Estimate kpts/sec
58463,36630.5,0.00
59664,37034.0,336.15
59964,37256.6,417.27
60264,37354.4,402.04
60564,37434.0,382.49
60864,37581.4,396.07
61164,37632.4,370.95
61464,37774.5,381.20
61765,37853.2,370.38
62665,38256.9,387.10
62965,38296.7,370.14
63865,38740.1,390.53
65066,39143.8,380.67
65366,39304.9,387.46
65666,39422.7,387.66
66866,39827.9,380.50
67166,39971.8,383.92
67467,40052.6,380.10
68367,40455.8,386.26
68667,40520.4,381.23
68967,40665.0,384.10
69267,40795.1,385.48
69567,40940.3,388.14
69867,40959.1,379.57
70168,41104.2,382.23
70468,41233.4,383.44
70768,41309.2,380.24
71068,41427.2,380.55
71368,41570.6,382.82
72568,42054.2,384.52
72869,42147.4,382.98
73169,42290.9,384.92
73469,42310.3,378.52
73769,42443.1,379.77
74069,42586.8,381.68
74969,42990.4,385.31
75269,43087.8,384.23
76770,43490.9,374.75
77670,43633.3,364.60
78271,43797.3,361.83
78571,43866.2,359.86
79471,44003.7,350.98
80371,44147.2,343.10
80671,44170.1,339.50
81272,44312.5,336.81
81572,44352.2,334.15
81872,44497.0,336.05
82172,44572.8,334.99
82472,44742.0,337.85
83072,44972.1,338.96
83373,45073.9,338.97
83673,45199.8,339.93
84273,45383.8,339.15
84573,45527.2,340.74
85173,45671.7,338.50
86974,46383.0,342.07
87274,46523.9,343.39
87574,46656.1,344.40
88174,46801.8,342.34
89075,47205.5,345.46
89375,47285.6,344.70
89675,47414.8,345.52
90875,47847.6,346.08
91776,48251.2,348.84
92076,48306.9,347.38
92376,48449.1,348.50
92676,48509.4,347.21
92976,48701.4,349.75
93276,48771.2,348.74
94176,49174.9,351.25
94477,49316.1,352.25
95677,49737.6,352.21
95977,49882.3,353.25
96277,49959.8,352.50
96577,50116.8,353.84
97178,50329.9,353.86
97478,50440.5,353.97
97778,50521.5,353.33
98078,50702.8,355.23
98678,50844.6,353.45
99579,51248.2,355.53
99879,51379.3,356.12
100179,51521.8,356.97
100479,51664.6,357.82
100779,51703.7,356.21
101079,51846.1,357.04
101380,51989.4,357.88
102580,52392.9,357.29
102880,52555.8,358.54
103180,52577.6,356.62
103480,52711.9,357.23
103780,52854.3,358.01
104081,52973.2,358.26
104981,53377.0,360.00
106182,53844.9,360.75
106482,53973.7,361.18
106782,53998.6,359.45
107082,54140.8,360.16
107982,54543.4,361.74
108283,54673.3,362.17
109483,55076.8,361.55
110383,55480.5,363.06
110684,55626.1,363.76
110984,55671.0,362.54
111284,55828.6,363.46
111584,55972.1,364.11
111884,56032.7,363.20
112184,56176.5,363.84
112484,56318.7,364.45
112785,56399.8,363.93
113085,56470.3,363.22
113985,56873.9,364.60
114886,57277.1,365.93
115186,57356.6,365.40
115486,57381.4,363.91
115786,57536.8,364.71
116686,57940.2,366.00
116987,58021.7,365.52
117287,58168.0,366.14
117587,58314.7,366.76
118187,58456.5,365.45
122089,59171.8,354.28
122991,59311.6,351.50
123891,59453.0,348.82
124191,59474.1,347.55
125093,59615.7,344.97
125393,59643.3,343.84
125693,59712.9,343.34
126594,59856.4,340.90
127795,59996.5,337.02
128096,60047.5,336.30
129296,60190.3,332.61
129596,60271.5,332.35
130797,60427.1,328.98
133202,60830.7,323.80
135907,61234.4,317.70
136207,61296.1,317.27
136507,61320.6,316.36
137408,61453.7,314.44

Will let it start over tonight and run a full 24 hours then

I will game on the prescott tonight lol

 

[JonB]

And when you include your gaming "lapse of judgement"

358.135 is the Median
359.2275362 is the Mean

382 looks better. You caused a 6.82% drop in production just to satisfy your gaming addiction. I suggest a Seven Step Program. Stat.

 

[Wolfsraider]

Rotflmao and that was just an hour or 2 dang it, I game more than that.

24 hours done here


137408,61453.7,314.44
138308,61594.6,312.66
138609,61699.4,312.79
138909,61841.2,313.39
140109,62304.1,314.45
140409,62414.0,314.64
140710,62481.3,314.31
141910,62962.1,315.55
143111,63365.8,315.84
143411,63510.9,316.43
143711,63613.2,316.52
144612,64016.8,317.90

Still gaming too

Lotro is addictive as is silent hunter 3, and c and c 3 oh man i need a new hobby

 

[Wolfsraider]

Ok planning on resetting the app at 6pm roughly maybe 8 pm though, what do i do just stop the benchmark delete the benchcsv file and restart after making the changes (You have to make sure sample files downloading is switched off in config.txt for this to work properly. )?

Thank you

Mike

 

[Wolfsraider]

Originally posted by: JonB
Wolfsraider, I've tried it both ways. The update feature just will cause an occasional false high number. I left update on finally and just tossed out some highs and lows. A median value is representative, not to be confused with a mean (or average).

Just for fun, after doing a Text to Columns in Excel, here are your values:

382.655 (median value)
382.8103571 (mean value or Average)

you can see that there isn't much difference, and shouldn't be if the sample size is large enough.

Call it 382 and nobody can argue.

Ah ok Thank you very much. I appreciate the info sorry i was so delayed in answering!

 

[Assimilator1]

Amaroque
The graph doesn't support this

A?,are you looking at the same graph as me? because it does ,if you compare Deleenheris XP @1.92GHz vs Thors XP@2GHz ,Thors XP is slightly faster despite a considerably FSB disadvantage.
Same again with Stephen Brooks Ath64 @2.1Ghz & Jumpings Ath64 @2.2GHz (though DPC LittleB seems to buck the trend slightly ) & again with Draxxs X2 @2.65GHz vs zs X2 @2.8GHz ,clock speed wins over FSB (just in the last case).
Im not saying that FSB has no impact but that clock speed (& architecture) is the predominant factor.

Ref cache ,if you compare my Semp 3100 @2.39GHz vs Mezocops Ath64 @2.4GHz the scores are identical despite his CPU having double the L2 cache.(Though the picture is muddied a little by differing FSB & RAM speeds).
HaloJones's Opteron @2.76GHz has a point advantage only a little more than the clock speed advantage despite 4x the L2 cache size & similiar FSB @ 276MHz (though we don't know his RAM speed).
I do admit looking back on it though that cache size effect on the Ath XPs isn't clear ,mine ,badgers & Halojones all score ~261Kpts/s despite different configs ,its as if XPs hit a brick wall at that point.Its a pitty I can't run my XPM rig at 200FSB for a proper comparision.

Wolfsraider
Thanks for that ,sorry for the lack of replie but my net went down for reasons unknown
Btw your 6600 @2.13 GHz?

Ref the benchmark ,yes turn off sample files downloading in config.txt.
Inccidently the graph I linked shows benchmarks from a previous version of DPAD ,current version runs about 15% slower.

Jonb
lol

 

[Wolfsraider]

Originally posted by: Assimilator1
Amaroque
The graph doesn't support this

A?,are you looking at the same graph as me? because it does ,if you compare Deleenheris XP @1.92GHz vs Thors XP@2GHz ,Thors XP is slightly faster despite a considerably FSB disadvantage.
Same again with Stephen Brooks Ath64 @2.1Ghz & Jumpings Ath64 @2.2GHz (though DPC LittleB seems to buck the trend slightly ) & again with Draxxs X2 @2.65GHz vs zs X2 @2.8GHz ,clock speed wins over FSB (just in the last case).
Im not saying that FSB has no impact but that clock speed (& architecture) is the predominant factor).

Ref cache ,if you compare my Semp 3100 @2.39GHz vs Mezocops Ath64 @2.4GHz the scores are identical despite his CPU having double the L2 cache.(Though the picture is muddied a little by differing FSB & RAM speeds).
HaloJones's Opteron @2.76GHz has a point advantage only a little more than the clock speed advantage despite 4x the L2 cache size & similiar FSB @ 276MHz (though we don't know his RAM speed).
I do admit looking back on it though that cache size effect on the Ath XPs isn't clear ,mine ,badgers & Halojones all score ~261Kpts/s despite different configs ,its as if XPs hit a brick wall at that point.Its a pitty I can't run my XPM rig at 200FSB for a proper comparision.

Wolfsraider
Thanks for that ,sorry for the lack of replie but my net went down for reasons unknown
Btw your 6600 @2.13 GHz?

Ref the benchmark ,yes turn off sample files downloading in config.txt.
Inccidently the graph I linked shows benchmarks from a previous version of DPAD ,current version runs about 15% slower.

Jonb
lol

Its a e6600 2.4 but i am running it at 2.65 wee bit of an oc

sorry will try sand run it again tonight or tommorow with samples off and no gaming.

I had another interview with metro and should get results back from post office on friday, so trying ton track down letters of recomendations from past bosses this week.

Wish me luck

 

[Amaroque]

Thank you for the info! HaloJones's is a former teammate of mine at TGC!

 

[Wolfsraider]

Grumble grumble, I deleted the benchmark file after stopping it

I recieved an error that muon1 has stopped working.

I restarted it but it wont restart, keeps giving errors then it says quarentining the results file


over 2000kb gone.

Fixed now but GRRRRRR!!!

Redownloaded the dpad client after renmoving the old one (So started fresh)