FallenHero
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2006
- 5,659
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Originally posted by: crt1530
During a random drug search, police dogs found there could be drugs in the teacher's desk and he gave authorities consent to search his car. That's where police found half of a marijuana cigarette.
I guess he smoked so much dope he forgot how to say "I will not consent to a search of my vehicle" and "I want a lawyer." Freaking moron. I wouldn't want him teaching my kids because he's too freaking stupid. Seriously. What kind of imbecile consents to a vehicle search when they have drugs in the car?
Yeah I'm pretty sure he didn't know they searched his car until after they searched his car. Probable cause (papers smelling of weed) = warrant for search.
You might be hard pressed to get a warrant for a search of anything beyond the classroom. Until his admission of course...then well...he was screwed no matter what.
Don't special situations come into play when within a 100ft of schools concerning drugs? Haven't read the laws in awhile concerning this.
The only thing that makes it different is maybe the sentence. They could have walked a dog around his car without any PC anyway as the courts have ruled that its perfectly legal to do so. But a warrant for a home or even the car is really stretching it. Convincing a judge to grant permission to search the most protected area of the entire united states (read: your home) based on some foul smelling papers is going to be really really hard.
EDIT: As for the car...like I said, they probably asked permission to search to cover their bases. If the dog hit on the car, they dont need a warrant to search it. That alone is enough PC to enter it on the spot.
