• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Teacher Arrested Under Peeping-Tom Law

Amused

Elite Member
Teacher Arrested Under Peeping-Tom Law
By PAUL J. WEBER
AP
DALLAS (Jan. 11) - A high school teacher was charged under Texas' peeping-tom law with videotaping girls' wrestling matches for his sexual enjoyment.

Police said David Ware, 28, often zoomed in for close-up shots of the girls' crotches.

The first-year speech and drama teacher planned to turn himself in to Grand Prairie police this week on charges of improper visual recording, which carries up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Ware shot about two hours of videotape at an all-day tournament Saturday but drew suspicion from a coach, Grand Prairie Sgt. John Brimmer said. A police officer reviewed Ware's tape.

"This was more than accidental footage of the genital areas," Brimmer said. "It appeared to be a purposeful act of zooming in."

Ware was charged under a 2001 law meant to protect people from ultra-small cameras that can be used to peek into dressing rooms or up women's skirts. Under the law, filming a person without consent for sexual arousal is a felony.

Ware's school, Garland Lakeview Centennial High School, was not entered the wrestling tournament.

His attorney, Scott Palmer, said Ware was simply interested in wrestling. And the lawyer complained that the law is so broad that could be used to jail Dallas Cowboys fans for taking pictures of the team's sultry cheerleaders from the stands.

"How do you draw the line?" Palmer said. "If you go to a Cowboys game and take a close-up shot of their cleavage, are you committing the same offense because you think that has sex appeal?"

School officials said Ware has been placed on paid leave.
 
girls' wrestling? never heard of that other than like oil/mus/jello etc but then whats the problem? Are these HS girls or college girls or what?
 
the cheerleaders know they're being taped and photographed, and that some wackos are going to spank to it
 
While it's pretty clear this guy is a sicko and should not be anywhere near a school or minors, that law is terribly broad. The defense attorney makes a (seemingly) valid point.... The law was badly written, it needs to be more specific to make it clear what behavior the law was intended to curb.
 
...and how is that peeping tom? Was it at a wrestling match? If so, then all the spectators should have been arrested.

edit: nevermind the guy is sick. Zooming in and stuff.
 
When in a public place you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. Anyone can photograph any part of your body at any time.
 
Yeah morality police. If it is a public even then he can do whatever he wants. He zoomed in on their cootchies? So what. a 16-17-18 year old girl in tights can be hot. I'll admit that I've seen some 16-17 year old chicks that I wouldn't mind doing. If this guy wants pics or a video fine, you can debate the morality of it all you want but it should not be illegal. Who's the victim?
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Sexual thoughts of any and all kind should be made illegal and punishable by death.

That'll teach us to obey millions of years of evolutionary drive to procreate! 🙂

On one hand, the teacher should've known he'd draw attention filming the matches, especially after he dropped his pants during the semi-finals. On the other, the law, while the spirit of it meant to address a real problem, is far too broad. Thoughtcrime?
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Who's the victim?

imagine if some guy was filming your ass and crotch for several hours and then spanking to it later.

And you are never aware it's being done? I understand the idea but also don't see the victim.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Who's the victim?

imagine if some guy was filming your ass and crotch for several hours and then spanking to it later.

If I'm in a public place, more power to him. How is he harming me?

If I'm in a place with some expectation of privacy, or he is looking up a girl's skirt, then no.
 
Originally posted by: mundane
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Sexual thoughts of any and all kind should be made illegal and punishable by death.

That'll teach us to obey millions of years of evolutionary drive to procreate! 🙂

On one hand, the teacher should've known he'd draw attention filming the matches, especially after he dropped his pants during the semi-finals. On the other, the law, while the spirit of it meant to address a real problem, is far too broad. Thoughtcrime?

Dont you know....PC and Evolution CANT MIX.
 
Back
Top