How many of these children are babies?
vs.
How many are partially grown children with significant issues from have been abused/neglected for years?
Which child would you rather adopt?
So, uhh, you suggest we should substitute one sort of alleged abuse for an even greater one perpetrated by govt?
What makes you think that poor children are abused by their parents rather than systemically, by policies that pander to your own headset?
The fundamental flaw in all Righties' headsets is this fixation on the notion that society's downtrodden are there because they lack "personal responsibility". It happens because we haven't lived up to our own ideals as expressed in the Constitution-
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"We the people", not "I the self righteous wingnut". Insure domestic tranquillity, promote the general welfare. Not deny the interdependence of us all on each other by raving about personal responsibility from a position of power over the least powerful members of society. Not denying the existence of "We" as expressed in democracy itself.
"We" pay some of America's wealthiest vast sums in the form of farm subsidies, tax breaks & so forth to create a situation where food isn't scarce at all, but rather abundant, unlike the situation in the late 18th century. "We" didn't do that so that idiots could rave about others receiving "free food" as if they actually suffer from such being the case at all. We did it so that free food could exist for those who need or want it, because it's difficult to tell the difference in any honest sort of way. "We" don't even care about that, other than the moralistic simpletons among us, so long as those in need receive what they need. "We" can easily afford to be generous in this regard, because "We" have made food so abundant that more of it likely gets thrown away than given away, all at minimal expense to any of us. "We" have created food resources so enormous that only fools like yourself can even think of coveting what little others have, aided by an antiquated way of distributing food as if it were actually scarce.
What's next? Idiots like yourself claiming that those you consider undeserving shouldn't be allowed air?
You've already declared that they don't deserve food, shelter, freedom or much of anything else, so it seems like the next logical step in your progression towards Libertopian lunacy.