barrack whosain obama still supports the program
So does Congress, as well as every President from LBJ to Obama.
Last edited:
barrack whosain obama still supports the program
So what? Feeding kids is some terrible thing? You'd support all the corporate welfare and military spending in the world, but feeding kids is some heinous abuse of taxpayer money? Get some fucking perspective.
What if the kid already had McDonalds but wants some free watermelon as well? He or she will get even fatter.
How about you get some perspective. Where did I support corporate welfare and military spending. This costs TAXPAYERS MONEY WHEN THE COUNTRY IS ALREADY IN BAD CONDITION.
Yes, and the damage is far reaching.
Fuck you.
EVERYTHING COSTS TAXPAYERS MONEY. THIS IS FAR FROM THE MOST EXPENSIVE TAXPAYER-FUNDED PROGRAM, AND CUTTING IT WOULD DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD.
Maybe if Incorruptible had gotten a few free lunches, he'd, well, be able to reason.
Why are you getting so angry? The program is being ABUSED which is a waste of tax dollars
Right, because advocating morals that lead to child hunger and then complaining when children go hungry without government bailouts is a a sign of "reason"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...unch-program-feeds-controversy-in-california/
Taxpayers are on the hook to feed children and many of these children actually come from families that make enough money but are lazy. This is just wrong and makes no sense at all.
This is another case where the government has no right to be involved and is wasting tax dollars. It is not the governments job to feed people.
This program needs to be ended since it costs taxpayers too much, Do you agree?
Looks like someone else needs a free lunch too.
Why are you getting so angry? The program is being ABUSED which is a waste of tax dollars
dude they give out cold cut sammiches, fruit cup and a and 1/2 pint of milk. big fucking deal. wasting tax dollars not found.
Yep. Maybe you and Incorruptible can become lunch buddies :sneaky:
my kids elementary and high school has offered this program the past couple of years. no we dont live in the ghetto we live in a small farming community so incomes are not that high. I have no problem with feeding people or this program, i would rather see money spent on programs like this than to be dropping bombs and shooting bullets at people.
http://www.greeleyschools.org/cms/l...Domain/423/2012-05-07 summer food program.pdf
May 10, 2012
Summer meal program helps close hunger gap
School District 6 will sponsor a federal Summer Food Service Program beginning May 29, providing
free meals to children ages 118 in Greeley and Evans
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...unch-program-feeds-controversy-in-california/
Taxpayers are on the hook to feed children and many of these children actually come from families that make enough money but are lazy. This is just wrong and makes no sense at all.
This is another case where the government has no right to be involved and is wasting tax dollars. It is not the governments job to feed people.
This program needs to be ended since it costs taxpayers too much, Do you agree?
no i do not. i can think of many many many other programs that should be cut before this. like of all the BILLIONS we send over seas in foreign aid. just one billion of that to feed our own people is ok by me.
Why should taxpayers pay for this, its the parents responsibility to feed children
I'd rather starve.
Sorry, I don't see any "morals that lead to child hunger" here.
Poverty happens. Children should be taken care of.
Period.
And if a few less-than-poor kids also get some decent food in them, that's fine with me.
Support of divorce and having bastard children.
Funny how liberals support morality(divorce, bastard children) that causes children to have bad lives and than complain about it.
Now what was your point again???States ranked by rates of live births among women age 15-19 (births per thousand):
- Mississippi (71)
- Texas (69)
- Arizona (67)
- Arkansas (66)
- New Mexico (66)
- Georgia (63)
- Louisiana (62)
- Nevada (61)
- Alabama (61)
- Oklahoma (60)
This. I have great scorn for those parents who will not feed their own children before themselves, but feeding hungry children, though probably not strictly Constitutional, has to be one of the least egregious things government does. The children may grow up thinking it's the government's duty to support them, but at least they won't grow up with low IQs from poor nutrition.Out of all the crap our government wastes money on, I think feeding kids... even those whose parents can afford to feed them on their own... is the least egregious.