Oh not at all. He violated no moral principle when he killed his wife. He was completely morally justified, but of course, only in his own mind, and acted out of the same moral certainty that she should die as you act toward him. This is why vengeance against those who practice rightful vengeance themselves, is just a different form of the same insanity. Nothing you can do to this guy will rectify a single thing he did. Nothing can be gained from this creature's life except the example you can set to differentiate yourself from how he treated his wife. You apparently do not know the virtue of mercy because you have none and feel no moral compulsion to set a good example.
The satisfaction that others suffer is the exact sickness that killers feel.
I understand you perfectly. You think you see the big picture because you don't see a larger one. I have no need for compassion for those who have to bear the cost that a virtuous life demands because I bear those costs willingly as the price of admission to the human race.
The difference between the morals in my mind and the morals in his mind, are that my mind has correct morals, while his are wrong. Out of the two of us ONE HAS TO BE RIGHT, there are two choices, either it was OK for him to murder his wife (his idea) or that it wasnt (my idea), one is right and one is wrong. mine is right.
Go ahead, tell me "Noone is right or wrong, who are you to say you are right" "Everyones opinion is right, its an opinion" thats not fucking true. His mind is broken if he thought he was doing anything correctly.
Last edited: