- Jan 2, 2006
- 10,455
- 35
- 91
So I'm sitting here thinking about how a lot of stylus systems have lag issues and accuracy issues, and I can't help but notice the parallels between when wireless mice first came out and their issues with lag.
A typical passive stylus that relies entirely on the touch sensitivity of the screen is limited by the screen itself.
An active stylus relies in large part in the technology of the stylus itself as well as the screen. Unfortunately, active styluses are often mated to a closed system - the Apple Pencil only works on the iPad Pro, and the Microsoft Pen seems to only work on the Surface tablets. There doesn't seem to be a big open standard like what wireless mice used to have.
But say that I buy into a system with an active stylus, such as an older 2015 Surface 3 (non-pro). Would upgrading to a more advanced stylus in the future mean I could get better performance?
A typical passive stylus that relies entirely on the touch sensitivity of the screen is limited by the screen itself.
An active stylus relies in large part in the technology of the stylus itself as well as the screen. Unfortunately, active styluses are often mated to a closed system - the Apple Pencil only works on the iPad Pro, and the Microsoft Pen seems to only work on the Surface tablets. There doesn't seem to be a big open standard like what wireless mice used to have.
But say that I buy into a system with an active stylus, such as an older 2015 Surface 3 (non-pro). Would upgrading to a more advanced stylus in the future mean I could get better performance?