Take two rejects EA

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
I really like Take-two.
EA isn't happy about it.
I could care less how happy EA is :)

http://www.gamasutra.com/php-b..._index.php?story=18006
March 26, 2008

Pachter: 'Take-Two's Board Has Made A Mistake'

Following the Take-Two board's official rejection of EA's buyout offer, Wedbush Morgan's Michael Pachter has called the move a mistake, firmly stating the publisher has "virtually no chance of finding a better offer."

"We're frankly surprised by Take-Two's rejection of EA's offer," said Pachter, noting that shares of the publisher were trading at $17 immediately before the offer, and that shares of the company have not reached near EA's asking price of $26 since new management took over, and that the company "has consistently lost money for the last two years."

"We think that the Board has virtually no chance of finding a better offer," he said, and that "this deal... makes more sense for EA than for any other company, primarily because of the synergies from consolidation of the two companies' sports businesses. No other company is in the position to realize those synergies, which we believe are substantial."

We agree that EA is being opportunistic," Pachter admits, "and completely accept as true that EA's offer was predicated on acquiring Take-Two before the shipment of Grand Theft Auto IV. To the extent that EA is forced to wait until after the game ships, we believe that EA will perceive Take-Two to be less valuable, and believe that its offer will be lowered, if made at all."

"In our view, Take-Two's Board has made a mistake," he says. "We believe that the company was positioned to extract a higher offer from EA by offering a friendly transaction, and its Board chose to continue its adversarial posture." While he says that EA's offer was not necessarily a "friendly" one, it only turned hostile after its first two friendly offers were rejected.

Pachter also says that "Take-Two's position that the company will have greater value after the release of Grand Theft Auto IV is naive at best, and disingenuous at worst," calling it "inconceivable" that reviews or first-week sales of the game will "impact the company's valuation in any meaningful way."

"Had they offered an olive branch," he concludes, "we think that EA may have increased its offer by $1 or more. Instead, the Board chose to reject EA's offer. Once the tender expires, we expect that EA will receive tenders of more than 50% of Take-Two shares, mooting today's recommendation. If the company does not receive majority control through a tender, we expect it to withdraw its offer, and we expect Take-Two shares to decline by 20% or so. This presumes that the market will expect EA to come back at a later date, which is not assured."





While he says that EA's offer was not necessarily a "friendly" one, it only turned hostile after its first two friendly offers were rejected.

In other words, we offered them money, and when they didn't take it , we sent around our hired thugs to 'convince' them.


awwww, poor EA , they didn't bow down and kiss your feet.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
hmm hostile, I wonder why? I mean EA has only destroyed all the IP they have gotten their hands on. They cannot own and publish everything.
 

EvilComputer92

Golden Member
Aug 25, 2004
1,316
0
0
So the deal is off right? I'm not interested in seeing EA absorb any more companies. They should first manage the studios they own properly.

Are they still in a position to go directly to shareholders however?
 

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
Take Two should just make Rockstar into it's own company then sell. That way EA gets WAY shafted. That's the only damn reason they want T2 is for GTA. And fuck me sideways if EA ever gets their hands on that franchise.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: EvilComputer92
So the deal is off right? I'm not interested in seeing EA absorb any more companies. They should first manage the studios they own properly.

Are they still in a position to go directly to shareholders however?

Nope:

http://www.gamasutra.com/php-b..._index.php?story=18002
The company also announced that it has adopted a Stockholders Rights Agreement to protect stockholders against unsolicited attempts to acquire control of the company at an inadequate price or which is otherwise deemed not to be in the best interests of Take-Two and its stockholders. The rights become exercisable if any entity acquires 20 percent of more of common stock, but will not apply to existing stockholders unless they acquire an additional 2 percent of stock.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: m0mentary
I saw the word "synergies" one too many times...

Well they wanted to use the word assimilation, but that was too obvious.

I would say it's a more politically correct way to say monopoly.

"the synergies from consolidation of the two companies' sports businesses"
-means-
"the monopoly from consolidation of the two companies' sports businesses"
 

ZzZGuy

Golden Member
Nov 15, 2006
1,855
0
0
EA has once again shown themselves to be a bunch of flaming A.O.'s.

They want to buy Take Two to get the money to be made by GTA4, yet say that Take Two will not make any money off of GTA4. EA stated they are much less interested after GTA4 gets released, so I doubt they are after the staff or the IP.

EA's going to have to work a lot harder for my money now (that and little to on DRM).
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0

I think after the Vivendi/Activision thing, EA is worried about their "market leader" position.












Good.








I want them worried. Either they'll die due to the poor quality of their products, or they will improve said products. Either way, I win.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
33
91
Is there any one majority shareholder in this company? I find it hard to believe that a company that has lost money 2 straight years (according to the article) would be able to convince shareholders to keep their shares instead of selling them for $26 a pop.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Take Two is publicly held.

And I see no reason, generally speaking, why I'd be in a rush to sell them right now. They have a strong publishing and development portfolio. Businesses, especially things like media entertainment that only release a couple products yearly, don't always turn a year over year profit.

There are a lot of unanswered questions. It's been a while since the last Grand Theft Auto, and those tend to rake in the profits.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Is there any one majority shareholder in this company? I find it hard to believe that a company that has lost money 2 straight years (according to the article) would be able to convince shareholders to keep their shares instead of selling them for $26 a pop.

GTA4 will be coming out soon, and it will make lots of money for them. It will probably be the best selling game of the year.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
33
91
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Is there any one majority shareholder in this company? I find it hard to believe that a company that has lost money 2 straight years (according to the article) would be able to convince shareholders to keep their shares instead of selling them for $26 a pop.

GTA4 will be coming out soon, and it will make lots of money for them. It will probably be the best selling game of the year.

Wouldn't that already be taken into account? It's not like a GTA release, and subsequent massive sales, is going to be a surprise to anyone.

Also, I know the company is publicly held. That does not prevent a couple of people in the general public being owner's of 50%+ of the shares.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,595
6,067
136
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
Originally posted by: Canai
Fuck EA

/thread

:thumbsup:

:beer:

Looks like "Take Two" gave EA two all right. Two big middle fingers in the air.
 

LumbergTech

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2005
3,622
1
0
feels good to see EA get a slap to the face like this...

take your garbage brand and shove it up your ass....you ruin games