TAC Note: Correlizer currently non-responsive to user requests for info!

[Rudy Toody]

I left a message here to let them know we were discussing this problem.

So, do we continue to use our resouces to maintain our number-one position? Or, do we find something better?

 

[zzuupp]

The lack of communication has been a regular occurrence. Also, I don't think that this makes them unique.
I'm not concerned yet: This is happening over a weekend in the summertime.

I'm being patient.
If I do decide to give this one up, I'll get that last milestone.

 

[zzuupp]

Looks like they've reset the server. (and nothing else)

All of my queue has processed, but new work is minimal.

 

[biodoc]

The last post from the project admin, scientist, etc was Nov, 2011. http://svahesrv2.bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de/correlizer/forum_user_posts.php?userid=1

There's only one publication that I know of: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701493/

I suspect the project admin has decided it's too much of a hassle dealing with the end user and/or the project isn't that important to them anymore. If the work/results are useful to them, they know if they submit work, they will get results whether they communicate with us or not so why bother?

RT do you know of another project where we could take first place? It would be difficult, I think.

 

[zzuupp]

http://svahesrv2.bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de/correlizer/forum_thread.php?id=109

They're back! The link is an apology from one of the admins.

 

[Rudy Toody]

http://svahesrv2.bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de/correlizer/forum_thread.php?id=109

They're back! The link is an apology from one of the admins.

Great! I take back everything I said.

 

[biodoc]

Me too!