Doesn't make sense. Remember, a CPU only uses enough power to handle the task at hand... be that a Celeron or an i7. At idle or normal streaming use, it hardly uses any CPU muscle at all and, therefor, very little power.
Just FYI, unless you are encoding or something else... that i5 is absurd overkill. A simple 2-core Pentium or Celeron will do for normal HTPC use.
Does it make sense to use one of the lower TDP processors for an always on HTPC, like the Intel Core i5-4460T, or is that a bad idea for reasons I may not fully understand. My thinking is less heat, smaller, quieter fan/heatsink = less noise in my living room.
Thanks,
Maiyr
I'm not familiar with the lowend processors for HTPC use as I'd like to be but don't certain ones have more EUs which are better for certain scalers?
I'm not familiar with the lowend processors for HTPC use as I'd like to be but don't certain ones have more EUs which are better for certain scalers?
Edit: This is nitpicky though, generally, if you're using something that needs a faster GPU you already know that. Like Charlie said, you most likely should be using a far cheaper CPU. I could use a J1900 Baytrail for the majority of my HTPC usage.
Your thinking is mostly correct, an i5 is total overkill. I like i3 for low power HTPC. A dual-core Celeron is more than adequate, too. You really don't even need that much, but it is good to have a little extra CPU HP in case you need to software decode some HD media for some reason.