Here's what T-break wrote at the end of their interview:
Here's the full interview: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?id=467
I think I pretty much agree with T-break on this one. A company like AMD won't want to spend enormous amounts of cash researching and developing high end discrete GPUs, they'd rather partner up with nVidia and let them take care of that while their ATi division does the CGPU stuff. Also with consoles like the 360/PS3 gaining steam and taking on more PCesque features (online gaming, hard drive, kb/mouse support [PS3], HDMI outputs [PS3], 1080i/p support) the costs will outstrip the returns for PC gaming and two competitors wouldn't be able to sustain themselves. I think with nVidia the only game in town we might still continue to see high end GPUs (though at a much slower pace I'm sure) for a little while longer.
So basically nVidia will continue to be a strong partner in the chipset market as well as a strong competitor at the same time in the GPU market. AMD?s comments also make me think that ATI might not focus on high-end discreet chipsets anymore but more on integrated solutions and the CE market. GPU on a CPU sure sounds like it?s in the works.
Here's the full interview: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?id=467
I think I pretty much agree with T-break on this one. A company like AMD won't want to spend enormous amounts of cash researching and developing high end discrete GPUs, they'd rather partner up with nVidia and let them take care of that while their ATi division does the CGPU stuff. Also with consoles like the 360/PS3 gaining steam and taking on more PCesque features (online gaming, hard drive, kb/mouse support [PS3], HDMI outputs [PS3], 1080i/p support) the costs will outstrip the returns for PC gaming and two competitors wouldn't be able to sustain themselves. I think with nVidia the only game in town we might still continue to see high end GPUs (though at a much slower pace I'm sure) for a little while longer.