T-bone 2900XT review

[tuteja1986]

http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?cat=grfx&id=511&pagenumber=5

Asus 8800GTX
ATI HD 2900XT
8800GTS 640MB

Call of Duty 2: 2048x1536- 4x/16x

8800GTX : 55.3
2900XT : 45.2
8800GTS : 40.7

F.E.A.R.: 2048x1536- 4x/16x
8800GTX : 52
2900XT : 41
8800GTS : 33

Quake 4: 2048x1536- 4x/16x
8800GTX : 49
2900XT : 43.7
8800GTS : 34.2

Serious Sam 2: 2048x1536- 4X/16x/HDR
8800GTX : 49.8
2900XT : 33.7
8800GTS : 35.1

 

[xSeongminx]

Which 8800GTS is this... The 320MB or 640?

 

[Noema]

The 2900XT squarely in the middle between the GTX and the GTS...sounds nice for less than $400...if true.

 

[Wreckage]

No link?

Was this done with a random bullshit generator?

 

[MadBoris]

I am going to copy/paste my post from another thread on this, this is bad methodology here:

Dunno if this was is floating around here yet.
The most favorable 2900xt marks yet.

http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?cat=grfx&id=511&pagenumber=1


EDIT:

I call shenanigans on this too.
They are using GTS and GTX scores from the original launch nvidia drivers from their 7 month old benchmarks
Compare old 8800 release scores: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?cat=grfx&id=474&pagenumber=5
Compare nvidia scores on 2900xt review: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?cat=grfx&id=511&pagenumber=2

More bad review methodology, no wonder drivers weren't mentioned. Also don't trust the choice of games, seems lopsided to me.

Still waiting for respectable reviews.

 

[schneiderguy]

Originally posted by: Wreckage
No link?

Was this done with a random bullshit generator?

he probably made them up. :roll:

edit: nevermind, somehow "t-bone 2900xt review" = tbreak?

wouldn't be the first time he posted a BS review