- Dec 14, 2004
- 7,664
- 0
- 71
I've been asked to build a dozen systems next month for an office. These computers will be used for nothing more demanding than running Office 2010, a few medical software titles that are no more demanding than Office 2010, and browsing the web.
The consideration that gives me pause is that I have been told these systems need to last until 2016. I'm not entirely sure why the customer demands this, but the customer wants what the customer wants and that's what I'm going to do for them.
So what would you do in terms of the CPU? The Celeron G530 is my new go-to CPU for office builds. But I don't know if it's going to cut it in 2016. Would you go for the Core i3-2100? Or would it be a better idea to spring for the i5-2300?
And how about for the SSD vs. HDD issue? HDDs are really expensive right now. Intel warrants many of their SSDs for 5 years, so they apparently don't consider reliability to be an issue for their SSDs. (Storage space is not an issue.) Or would you stick with HDDs simply because it's a more established (read: older) technology?
Thanks for your input.
The consideration that gives me pause is that I have been told these systems need to last until 2016. I'm not entirely sure why the customer demands this, but the customer wants what the customer wants and that's what I'm going to do for them.
So what would you do in terms of the CPU? The Celeron G530 is my new go-to CPU for office builds. But I don't know if it's going to cut it in 2016. Would you go for the Core i3-2100? Or would it be a better idea to spring for the i5-2300?
And how about for the SSD vs. HDD issue? HDDs are really expensive right now. Intel warrants many of their SSDs for 5 years, so they apparently don't consider reliability to be an issue for their SSDs. (Storage space is not an issue.) Or would you stick with HDDs simply because it's a more established (read: older) technology?
Thanks for your input.