Syria Provides Weapons To Hezbolla, UNIFIL Afraid of the Dark

[imported_dna]

Heh, I guess you said it all: "to earn the freedom of their fellow terrorists"....

EDIT: you should read up on old posts where people discuss the Geneva Convention, since you obviously don't know what you're talking about.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: dna
Are you saying that the mobile artillery units were placed in various intersections in Haifa? :roll:

Sure, we can have a discussion about hypotheticals, but as it stands, Hezbollah had no reason to attack in the first place.

EDIT: BTW, Israel, unlike Hezbollah, does not intentionally attack civilians, but thanks for showing your bias

Hezbollah was tring to earn the freedom of their fellow terrorists from israel when they captured the israelis. So they did have a reason to attack unless tring to free capture people isn't a valid reason to attack. If that is the case then israel had no right to attack.

You answered your own question. You are saying that "terrorists" have a "right" to attack if they are trying to free their "fellow terrorists".... ummm, ya, ok. Is the same true for drug dealers and murderers? Can they attack a prison to free their brethren? is that their "right"??!

So what if they attack civillians it doesn't matter. Those civilians are Israel's responsibility.

"So what"?!?! "SO WHAT"?!

that says everything we need to know. You are crazy.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: dna
Are you saying that the mobile artillery units were placed in various intersections in Haifa? :roll:

Sure, we can have a discussion about hypotheticals, but as it stands, Hezbollah had no reason to attack in the first place.

EDIT: BTW, Israel, unlike Hezbollah, does not intentionally attack civilians, but thanks for showing your bias

Hezbollah was tring to earn the freedom of their fellow terrorists from israel when they captured the israelis. So they did have a reason to attack unless tring to free capture people isn't a valid reason to attack. If that is the case then israel had no right to attack.

You answered your own question. You are saying that "terrorists" have a "right" to attack if they are trying to free their "fellow terrorists".... ummm, ya, ok. Is the same true for drug dealers and murderers? Can they attack a prison to free their brethren? is that their "right"??!

So what if they attack civillians it doesn't matter. Those civilians are Israel's responsibility.

"So what"?!?! "SO WHAT"?!

that says everything we need to know. You are crazy.

I'm not crazy DNA is crazy I'm just echo his position but for the otherside.
He claims it is ok to carpet bomb civillians because the terrorist use those towns. Then turns around and claims it is wrong for the terrorist to shoot rockets at israel dispite israel using those towns as part of it war effort.

He claims israel didn't start the war. I which is BS you can say either side started the war by picking a different day to call the start of the war.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: smack DownThen turns around and claims it is wrong for the terrorist to shoot rockets at israel dispite israel using those towns as part of it war effort.

ummm, when the hell did Israel use positions in downtown Haifa to launch rockets or any kind of attacks?

your argument fails right there.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: smack DownThen turns around and claims it is wrong for the terrorist to shoot rockets at israel dispite israel using those towns as part of it war effort.

ummm, when the hell did Israel use positions in downtown Haifa to launch rockets or any kind of attacks?

your argument fails right there.

No but they used positions in downtown Haifa to support the war it otherways.

 

[imported_dna]

In that case, carpet bombing Southern Lebanon -- without prior warning -- is fine by your logic.

Thanks for giving the green light

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: smack DownThen turns around and claims it is wrong for the terrorist to shoot rockets at israel dispite israel using those towns as part of it war effort.

ummm, when the hell did Israel use positions in downtown Haifa to launch rockets or any kind of attacks?

your argument fails right there.

No but they used positions in downtown Haifa to support the war it otherways.

how so? are you justifying Hezbollah's completely indescriminate rocket attacks of Haifa?! seriously?!

 

[imported_dna]

palehorse74, don't bother arguing with him -- he's basically saying that there is no such thing as "civilians". Due to that claim, any criticism he'll have against anti-terror operations by Israel, will have no validity, since everything is a fair target.

Aimster, Jhhnn -- we're waiting for you.