So I'm guessing it's a mostly paper launch designed to slow down R7 sales.
I love a good limited availability launch. It raises the stakes and ups the excitement!
Exactly. What is the fun in owning something that is readily available and relatively affordable? I prefer my purchases to be neither, but they have to be at least one of the two!Only the best contestants of the F5 Olympics will walk away with a hot cup of Coffee from the Lake!
Exactly. Might as well get as many 8700k sales as possible. I would think 7700k goes mostly to diyers who would wait for 8700k anyway. Might also persuade a lot of potential Ryzen buyers to wait.I would have held off on a 7700K the moment I heard about the 8700K and had a reasonable idea of it's release date.
So, I don't think that's as much of a factor now. People started holding off on the 7700K a long time ago, imo.
It's not that I haven't seen the posts detailing the new power pins, it's just that with CoffeeLake launching 9-10 months after KabyLake I find it hard to believe that Intel couldn't have predicted this requirement.Intel insisted because a new socket was required for the 6 core chip.
In Norway the CPUs aren't even listed...
Btw, if the delay is long then I might even wait for Pinnacle Ridge benchmarks and compare.
In Norway the CPUs aren't even listed...
Btw, if the delay is long then I might even wait for Pinnacle Ridge benchmarks and compare.
They have to worry about RR & PR, KBL inventory will also have to be depleted in the meantime. Basically they're damned if they do & double damned if they don't, the only silver lining is that overall the ASP will likely be higher.Komplett (no/se/dk) have 8700k in stock for anticipated 2 december. You can have 8400... at proshop in .dk a bit more expensive than 1600.
I havnt seen a similar launch for Intel like ever. There is just no meaningfull numbers of the interesting cpu.
Even 8700k review samples are shipped around. lol. - i think they should just have waited 2 months but hey they would probably not like to get close to february zen. Its not easy. Perhaps its better this way.
I am not so sure about the asp. 7700k was selling well. Right now in regards to what matters to asp 8700k have like excactly zero impact. I think it just means lost 7700k sale.They have to worry about RR & PR, KBL inventory will also have to be depleted in the meantime. Basically they're damned if they do & double damned if they don't, the only silver lining is that overall the ASP will likely be higher.
At the cost of less die/wafer translating into lower returns/wafer. The i3 models being the perfect example.They have to worry about RR & PR, KBL inventory will also have to be depleted in the meantime. Basically they're damned if they do & double damned if they don't, the only silver lining is that overall the ASP will likely be higher.
from the benchmarks it seems like you can get 8700k performance (at least for gaming) or better today by buying a used 5820k+ on x99... takes the wind out of Cofee Lake sails pretty hard. Hopefully anandtech's results were an anomaly but I fear not.
Another fix.If you take a look at the conclusion, the theory is additional cores being activated (when compared to 4c 7700k) which reduced the all core turbo (4.3Ghz compared to 4.4Ghz on 7700k).
Simple fix - apply a fixed multi-core turbo of 4.7Ghz.![]()
Another fix.
Go play the games that actually taxes the cpu.