• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Susan Rice is who we thought she was

Page 24 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
well, just remember that the most important work was done: Hillary isn't president. She would have been worse than Hitler. Trump soldiers and GOP brainbots did the dirty work to feed the 5 or so elites pulling their strings. Now we can all get back to...well, being perpetually fucked by supply-side nonsense and meaningless, distracting "culture-war" pablum.

good job, GOP voters! mindless and useless as ever.
 
Younigue said:
So... What is your point exactly? She's corrupt? More corrupt than Trump and crew? As corrupt? Why exactly does it matter? If she is what you say then maybe she'll be charged and go to jail. What should happen to those people you are trying to distract the conversation from? You are trying to bring the focus to a woman who did not win the Presidency. If the law brings her to justice then so be it but she is not leading the country. If ALL Democrats agreed simultaneously that you are correct how does that change anything about what The Filthy Pigs at the Head of the country are being accused of and very likely guilty? Do you fear Trump and crew will miss her when they're in prison? Will their card game be short one person? Hide and seek won't have the same feel without Hilary to join them? Marco Polo will just be Marco with out her there to call Polo? They should all be held accountable if they are guilty. Yes?

At the end of the day she is not representing the country. I would like to think the primary focus should be on the investigation that would remove potential traitors and then but only then sure as slick they should go to town on bringing her to justice if there is indeed anything to hold her accountable for.
Click to expand...
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
 
zinfamous said:
Canadian company, Canadian pipeline, Canadian jobs, Canadian oil, Canadian profit...but we must build that pipeline (if only to pollute our American waters, for no benefit)...FOR AMERICA!

sorry, I know the straw is overwhelming, but I had to do it. 😀
Click to expand...
lol +1
All our problems seem to come from Canada.
 
werepossum said:
Be sure and let me know how that works out for you.
Click to expand...

So far it's working out pretty well, haha.

I love how you accuse Clinton of being bribed to support that deal and seem oblivious to the fact that since 8 other agencies signed off on it there was almost certainly either a good justification (so no bribe needed) or they successfully bribed 9 agency heads in total, which is quite the conspiracy.

So basically you're either an idiot or a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. Both of these are very, very funny. Not the sharpest.
 
werepossum said:
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
Click to expand...
Oh ok then... So you're a total nut job. Got it.

But... She's not President. I want the President to be loyal to America, ya know? Regardless of what Hilary may or may not be guilty of. What do you think? Ruling from the pocket of Putin seems oh, I don't know... You tell me, how's that sound to you?
 
werepossum said:
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
Click to expand...

Even conservatives know that Trump only has good things to say about people who pays him compliments, nevermind pays him money.
 
fskimospy said:
So far it's working out pretty well, haha.

I love how you accuse Clinton of being bribed to support that deal and seem oblivious to the fact that since 8 other agencies signed off on it there was almost certainly either a good justification (so no bribe needed) or they successfully bribed 9 agency heads in total, which is quite the conspiracy.

So basically you're either an idiot or a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. Both of these are very, very funny. Not the sharpest.
Click to expand...

He's also continuing to ignore the little fact that the only person who could say yea or nay on the deal was the president. Seems like it would be a waste of money to bribe one person on a committee that can only offer it's opinions to the guy who actually makes the decision. <shrug>
 
Victorian Gray said:
He's also continuing to ignore the little fact that the only person who could say yea or nay on the deal was the president. Seems like it would be a waste of money to bribe one person on a committee that can only offer it's opinions to the guy who actually makes the decision. <shrug>
Click to expand...

Didn't you get the current talking point memo now being distributed? Clinton was actually running the WH, Obama, hell, the entire government from her secret lair under the pizza shop. The "detectives" got the emails all wrong.....they weren't anything anyone has suggested, they were action directives for governing with Obama as puppet.

Sheesh.


/s
 
fskimospy said:
So far it's working out pretty well, haha.

I love how you accuse Clinton of being bribed to support that deal and seem oblivious to the fact that since 8 other agencies signed off on it there was almost certainly either a good justification (so no bribe needed) or they successfully bribed 9 agency heads in total, which is quite the conspiracy.

So basically you're either an idiot or a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. Both of these are very, very funny. Not the sharpest.
Click to expand...
As I said:
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
 
Younigue said:
Oh ok then... So you're a total nut job. Got it.

But... She's not President. I want the President to be loyal to America, ya know? Regardless of what Hilary may or may not be guilty of. What do you think? Ruling from the pocket of Putin seems oh, I don't know... You tell me, how's that sound to you?
Click to expand...
If it makes you feel any better, at the moment Putin hates Trump more than he hates Hillary.
 
werepossum said:
As I said:
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
Click to expand...

Yes, those connections that were so tenuous that Trump associates have felt it necessary to lie to Congress and the FBI about them. The connections so tenuous that the FBI is currently investigating a member(members?) of the Trump campaign for collusion with a hostile foreign power. It's odd that the FBI is looking for tenuous connections with Trump but is willfully overlooking much more direct connections with Hillary. I'm sure the FBI is just full of delusional 'proggies' too though. 😉 Have you considered offering your services to them? You clearly appear to have either superior knowledge or superior analytic abilities.
 
fskimospy said:
Yes, those connections that were so tenuous that Trump associates have felt it necessary to lie to Congress and the FBI about them. The connections so tenuous that the FBI is currently investigating a member(members?) of the Trump campaign for collusion with a hostile foreign power. It's odd that the FBI is looking for tenuous connections with Trump but is willfully overlooking much more direct connections with Hillary. I'm sure the FBI is just full of delusional 'proggies' too though. 😉 Have you considered offering your services to them? You clearly appear to have either superior knowledge or superior analytic abilities.
Click to expand...

You left out the tenuous connections that required several to register as foreign agents.
 
werepossum said:
As I said:
My point was that the same people looking for tenuous connections with Trump willfully overlook much more direct connections with Hillary.
Click to expand...

Challenged to elaborate on the alleged "direct connections" you offer nothing but the same innuendo all over again. She's "directly connected" to the Russians how, exactly? Lay that out for us, Mkay?
 
Least shocking development of the week

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/03/susan-rice-testify-237947

Former Obama administration National Security Adviser Susan Rice on Wednesday declined a request to testify next week before a Senate subcommittee, citing separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches and the fact that the invitation was not bipartisan.

Rice’s decision to decline the invitation to testify on Russia’s election meddling came in a letter from her lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).
Click to expand...

The Judiciary subcommittee is holding a hearing next Monday that will feature testimony from former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
Click to expand...
 
ooo, the zombie lie resurfaces! Repubs must be stealing yet more shit from the American public today...must. invent. evil. democrat. story. Yearaarrgh!
 
Attempted diversion from Comey's testimony on Wednesday and the upcoming Sally Yates testimony on Monday. That one will be really special as she's expected to confirm the WH knew about Flynn for a loooooooooong time before canning him only after it became public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top