Chiropteran
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2003
- 9,811
- 110
- 106
I think it's because you work for the Russian government.
Mindless insanity confirmed.
Please go back to your conspiracy theory websites.
I think it's because you work for the Russian government.
Surely you can provide evidence that the FBI is acting so unethically???
Again, they aren't going to release anything to the public until they can move forward
In other words, they will never release anything. They can't move forward because it's a baseless case.
In other words, they will never release anything. They can't move forward because it's a baseless case.
LOL.
Yet you are fine and good with the FBI, with all it's resources, offering absolutely zero evidence of anything. More leftist hypocrisy.
No, he's a communist agent. It couldn't be more obvious. He said, for example, mindless insanity confirmed, which is a communist code word, not to mention that a bat is just a mole, an "m" word. He's just desperate to try and deflect from Russia's greatest, in their pocket, foreign agent. You know what you get when a yellow bellied coward turns red. Right, Orange Julius Caesar. Nobody can be so stupid as not to know that investigations require detailed parching of masses of data to determine what is evidence and what is noise. Only a traitor would deny something as simple and obvious as that, that it's data that is collected in the past and doesn't become evidence until looked at and judged to be sufficient to act on. That is what building a case means.They are investigating, they wouldn't release their findings until they are done.
Are you really this stupid?
They are investigating, they wouldn't release their findings until they are done.
Are you really this stupid?
You don't know that it's a baseless case, because they can't legally release the data. How many times do people have to tell you that investigators aren't going to release classified info simply because you want to see it? Whatever the truth, they're not going to publicize it until they have an airtight conclusion... and then only if they believe the data won't compromise operations and national security.
Completely absurd human being. Weren't you going to find a forum where people agree with you? You are horrible at your job of converting people to embrace your cult. You don't make convincing arguments or thought provoking statements. You are definitely not meeting your quota. Ya Fiyad (translation: you're fired).In other words, they will never release anything. They can't move forward because it's a baseless case.
The irony of you accusing someone else of mindless insanity. I literally laughed out loud. It startled my dog.Mindless insanity confirmed.
Please go back to your conspiracy theory websites.
Thanks.
If evidence hasn't been released, that means there is no evidence. If you can't make a claim without evidence, then all of you need to STFU until the evidence actually comes out.
You can't have it both ways. If you are going to call BS on my claims because of lack of evidence, then all of your claims are also BS by default until you can provide hard evidence.
You don't make convincing arguments or thought provoking statements.
There is no question that Russia tried to influence the election through WikiLeaks.
It seems you are the stupid one.
Do you want to buy a clue?
Here, this one is a freebie: Susan Rice is being investigated too. We might not have enough to put her in jail today, but it's coming!
Assange is a Russian now?
You are really bad at this conspiracy theory crap. At least make up something plausible.
BTW, which Trump person sold US uranium to Russia?
Oh wait, that was Hillary.
Assange is a Russian now?
You are really bad at this conspiracy theory crap. At least make up something plausible.
BTW, which Trump person sold US uranium to Russia?
Oh wait, that was Hillary.
Do you think I care to convince you of anything?
I'm just dropping knowledge. If you want to ignore it today, that is fine by me, tomorrow when it's proven true I'll be back to tell you I told you so.
It seems you are the stupid one.
Do you want to buy a clue?
Here, this one is a freebie: Susan Rice is being investigated too. We might not have enough to put her in jail today, but it's coming!
nah, you're dropping bullshit, and pointed fingers, but no facts, not even alt-facts.Do you think I care to convince you of anything?
I'm just dropping knowledge. If you want to ignore it today, that is fine by me, tomorrow when it's proven true I'll be back to tell you I told you so.
Link?
By the way it's pretty funny that you think Rice being investigated (even if true) would mean she was on her way to jail but Trump being investigated means 'nothing to see here!'.
Again, desperate motivated reasoning. Think logically, not emotionally.
It's standard right wing Benghazification.
The contention is that Rice asked for names to be unmasked in intelligence reports (her right as NSA) intended for her eyes only and that she subsequently leaked the information (a crime).
There is absolutely no evidence for the latter. There's not even any evidence that names other than Flynn were actually leaked at all. What are those names of the Trump entourage caught up in surveillance of the Russians that were allegedly leaked? Nobody knows, so they apparently haven't been leaked at all. What we know about their contact with the Russians comes from other sources entirely.
I would like to correct that the fact that information has surfaced, not intended for public eyes, does not equal a 'leak' as in corrupt intelligence/leaking individuals. Information has an abundance of pathways to get out.
I see this narrative beeing adapted, that "leaking" equals "individual" equals "corruption".. and that skips a couple of logical steps in the search of the truth.
The only person for whom specific information has been revealed has been Flynn & even that is vague. We don't know who in the Trump entourage may have been caught up in surveillance of the Russians or what was said, but there were apparently others that only Nunes, some in the IC & the Whitehouse seem to know about... but they'll be sending it to the HOR committee sometime rsn...
I'm just dropping ignorance
