Supreme Court Says Clean Air Trumps State's Rights in Upholding EPA Rule

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
News link here

In a victory for environmentalists and the Obama administration, the Supreme Court today ruled to uphold the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule set by Obama’s EPA in 2011. The rule requires 28 states to reduce power plant emissions that can negatively affect the air quality in neighboring states. Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in the case. The Court ruled 6-2 in favor of the rule with Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagen, Roberts and Kennedy joining Ginsburg in supporting the EPA mandate. Justices Anton Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the majority, arguing that the court’s decision ”feeds the uncontrolled growth of the administrative state at the expense of government by the people.” Read the rest on the site...
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,112
9,234
136
Least we are crystal clear on who to blame if there are blackouts. Congress / Bush gave Obama / EPA full authority on this matter.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Least we are crystal clear on who to blame if I die of Asthma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, Lung cancer, Small cell lung cancer or chronic heart disease.

Not to mention the plants and animals that we feed off of.
 
Last edited:

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
Least we are crystal clear on who to blame if there are blackouts. Congress / Bush gave Obama / EPA full authority on this matter.

Hostages! Righties love taking hostages! And extortion, the best part!

Oh Goodie!
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Good decision. Would that SCOTUS had similarly acted when Algore was protecting the North Carolina paper mill that regularly turned the Pigeon River interesting colors. Or was that the French Broad . . .
 

etrigan420

Golden Member
Oct 30, 2007
1,723
1
81
Scalia and Thomas are like Abbott & Costello...except they're both the dumb fat one.

:|
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
Good decision. Would that SCOTUS had similarly acted when Algore was protecting the North Carolina paper mill that regularly turned the Pigeon River interesting colors. Or was that the French Broad . . .

Ooooh! Oooooh! Diversionary slime attack!

Polluters, serial rapists and every other miscreant deserves their day in court & legal representation.

This is America, right?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,109
29,260
136
There is no right to clean air. I am tired of this activist court.

I am going to start burning coal in the fireplace and dumping the ash in the river to get back at these Eco kooks. /s
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
makes me mad because the epa encroaches on States' rights, causes a shitload of public debt, increases prices, all while the u.s.g. is the biggest polluter on the planet.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,655
6,222
126
There is no right to clean air. I am tired of this activist court.

I am going to start burning coal in the fireplace and dumping the ash in the river to get back at these Eco kooks. /s

Buy a Hummer and switch it to a coal burning Steam engine too!!
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
EPA needs to be abolished and does a lot of harm killing jobs.

Exactly, If you can't see the air you're breathing something is wrong!

los-angeles-smog_53499058.jpg


Good times!
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,109
29,260
136
No, Almost anytime I post you and your ilk come and attack me.

Post more than one liners and stop telling people to STFU and constantly calling them idiots and morons. You've earned the way you're treated. Want to be treated differently you need to start acting differently.

I would say 80% of the time you're the first one to lob the personal attack.