Supreme Court Case

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
Does anyone know the supreme court ruling on weather or not employers need to pay employees for time changing into uniforms? i tried looking it up on the supreme court page but it was quite confusing
 

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
Originally posted by: glenn1
IIRC, it was ruled in the employees' favor.

but there is no source to confirm?
and was this a state issue or a national issue?
 

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
i think there was one that a little more specific
it was supposed to be john roberts first case as supreme court justice
IIRC
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
8 hours if you're union? < /bash >



But seriously, this sounds like some class-action suit where emplyees get $10 each while the lawyers collect millions.

5 unpaid minutes of work a day, teh horror!
 

OrganizedChaos

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2002
4,524
0
0
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
What a strange case. I mean, how long does it take?

think of people who have to wear complicated stuff that has to be put on at the scene. divers, NBC suits, bunny suits, actors, etc.
 

AragornTK

Senior member
Dec 27, 2005
207
0
0
oh no! not that... I was an actor for four years in high school, I had to change at least 3 times per show in under a minute(for one show it was 7 times/30 sec. each) if you're a professional, you should be able to get dressed relatively fast, fire fighters do it in under a minute(as do armed forces personell with chemical equipment) anyone putting on terribly difficult clothing is probably also getting hazzard pay, and if they are an actor wearing a costume that's so terribly hard and it takes 4 hours to get into, they're probably making close to $100 per hour(minimum)

I've also had to get dressed at work due to school, and I've never had trouble getting pants, shirt, belt, shoes and various lanyards/pins on in under 2 minutes.

Employees are just being greedy