lopri
Elite Member
- Jul 27, 2002
- 13,212
- 597
- 126
And every other decision in the circuits after that found the laws in the other states are way more burdensome than Indiana's. But I am sure you've already read those.Let's read the decision together so you can see that you're wrong. The court even said outright that even if you stipulated that it created a higher burden for some, that STILL wasn't sufficient grounds to reverse the laws. In short they expressly rejected the exact assertion you're attempting to make. In short every assertion you made was a substitution of your opinion for the very clear text of the actual decision.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-21.pdf
Last edited:
