Supposed ipad 3 screen examined

Discussion in 'Mobile Devices & Gadgets' started by SAWYER, Feb 17, 2012.

  1. Mopetar

    Mopetar Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,556
    Likes Received:
    6
    Just saw this on Engadget and though that it was interesting. No idea if it's real or not, but it looks as though the next iPad will have an A5X SoC rather than an A6. I don't know if this is merely a difference in naming or if, as the article suggests, that the chip is just more of an incremental enhancement.
     
  2. Bateluer

    Bateluer Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2001
    Messages:
    27,733
    Likes Received:
    1
    Its been treated with Pixie dust, to make it more magical. :p
     
  3. MrX8503

    MrX8503 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 5X probably indicates the same dual core and possibly oveclocked with a beefed up GPU. I probably would be able to live with it if the GPU is powerful enough to drive the retina screen. The retina screen is the biggest upgrade to me IMO.
     
  4. Fire&Blood

    Fire&Blood Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,268
    Likes Received:
    5
    Makes sense. No one can seriously describe the ipad2 performance as lacking.
    Apple has the fastest chip and the most efficient OS already. This chip is likely a die shrink to 28nm so it opened up some room for clock maneuvering they took advantage of. I'm curious whether the GPU related changes involve a different part or different clocking. Either way, it should be good enough.
     
  5. IHateMyJob2004

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    17,699
    Likes Received:
    1
    Rick,

    Wouldn't a die shrnk mean more for battery life?
     
  6. dagamer34

    dagamer34 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    0
    More likely it'll be 32nm, as that's what Samsung's factories are tooled for. 28nm production comes from TSMC, and they have so many other customers to deal with (Qualcomm, nVidia, AMD, TI, etc..), I don't know if they can guarantee capacity to Apple on a new process.
     
  7. Fire&Blood

    Fire&Blood Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,268
    Likes Received:
    5
    Only if they decided to use the gained headroom towards the battery life. Since no one is exactly screaming about poor battery life in iOS, they will likely use some or all of the die shrink benefit towards performance while keeping battery life on par with previous generations.

    There has been talk in the past about Apple going with TSMC. If they wanted to, I'm sure they could have leveraged themselves into the production cycle, if they wanted to. Indeed, if they stayed with Samsung it's a 32nm chip but wouldn't change much vs a 28nm SoC.
     
  8. dagamer34

    dagamer34 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps some chips, but certainly not all (as sometimes implied by the Apple-Samsung patent spats).
     
Loading...