• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Suppose you wanted to double SSD capacity by adding another SSD . . both Samsung

First off, my boot SSD is an 840-Pro 500GB running in RAPID mode.

RAPID only allows for one SSD, even if you have two Samsungs.

I think it is possible to format an SSD as another Simple Volume/Basic Disk, omit putting a drive label on it, and linking it to the boot (RAPID mode) SSD through a shortcut in a "Program Files . . " folder, etc.

So one SSD would have an "effective" sequential read throughput of 1,000+ MB/s; the second one would operate at the basic spec ~500+ MB/s.

What problems would I encounter doing it this way? I'm not going to span the drives by running them in RAID mode. And fact is -- I could assign a drive label to the second SSD, use the shortcut approach already mentioned, and still store personal data files on the drive directly (as opposed to using a shortcut of the type described.).
 
Echo Dave_the_Nerd's comment. A second drive excluded from "Rapid" won't slow you down enough to worry about.
 
Echo Dave_the_Nerd's comment. A second drive excluded from "Rapid" won't slow you down enough to worry about.

That's what I thought.

I don't think I had ever done this sort of thing extensively, or I just experimented with it. But it's an "established method" I'd seen demonstrated or explained.

Point is -- I could just replace a 500 GB with a 1TB EVO. But if all I want to do is "extend" capacity with a second drive, this approach would seem to make more sense -- for the expense, the performance compromise (if any, really) and other factors.
 
Back
Top