While the post you referred to was by someone else...
I'd agree, however I might point towards research evidence that suggests that by attempting to extract power from the vacuum, per se, we are indeed not in violation of the conservation of energy.
The point I would like to make here is not so much whether we can technically do this, because a plethora of youtube videos suggest as much, but whether the time is rife to look at the details and reconsider if we didn't make a mistake a while back in history.
Here's a *highly technical* document. Apologies because it is quite advanced and I'm not exactly au fait with tensors and the mechanics of guage theories however it does support the ideas of Beardon and dare I even mention the projects of Bedini?!
http://www.gewo.info/ve/Evans/Evans.pdf
Can the engineers with ears then look again at the motion of the spinning planets, our own iron cored planet with spinning molten outercore producing significant amounts of electricity before we even consider gravity.
The precession of electrons around a nucleus seems to be somewhat perpetual to our everyday senses and we have empirical evidence to show that Tesla waves can in fact be induced and used to create negative time effects.
Sounds far fetched? A proper read of the literature, not just the highly censored and popular magazines published by those 'respectable' scientific journals (who by the way suffer popularity affectations much like the womans weekly, cleo and cosmopolitan) but the evidence and research coming from far and wide.
The maths in the doc above point to the potential to tap energy from the vacuum. Bedini-Cole motors, Tesla motors, Magnet motors and even solid state designs that appear to pump charge around a circuit all the while illuminating one or more useful lights appear to be reality.
I don't suggest for a minute we violate the conservation of energy principle. I do suggest we need to consider how much energy we can tap when we know there is an equivalent mass from energy on the order of 10^80 to 10^120 grams PER CUBIC CENTIMETRE of the vacuum.
Say we grab 0.00001%... still quite a bit, ain't it?
And it would be useful (in breaking the bonds of suppression) if we could agree that for all practical purposes, a 'so-called' perpetual motion machine would not need to run actually to infinity (the problem with Maxwell-Heavyside's equations) but for, say, a human lifetime, thereabouts. That would be perpetual. To date, I've not seen one of these. But I have seen circuits and demos that suggest as much is possible.
Time for a fresh look? What saith you?
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products
Facebook
Twitter