SUPERPI SHOOTOUT, 2 millionth calculation Anandtech Competition

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
B

billwinkle

Member
Mar 3, 2005
74
0
0
1m13s
pic

CPU: AMD64 (WINCHESTER) 3000+@2.66ghz 9x296fsb (1.45v)
htt: 3
MB: MSI K8N Neo4 platinum sli
HD:2x 200GB WD SATA RAID 0
HD:1X 200GB WD SATA
HD:1X 200GB WD IDE
RAM: 2X512 OCZ High Performance DDR400 revision 3
POWER: ENREMAX 480 NOISETAKER
DVD: NEC3500A
VIDEO: GIGABYTE 6600GT x2
cpu cooling ZALMAN 7000CU
 
GuitarDaddy

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Here's some crazy settings for ya!

Asus AN8-SLI 3200+ 1.55v
325.4 x 8 = 2603mhz 3x 325.4=976FSB
DDR266(133) ram @ 217mhz 2-2-2-7 1T 2.8v




SuperPI SSE2

1 min 12 sec
 
S

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
hmm.... i sitll think we should use that version i posted...

even at 2M people are going to get the same time...
 
T

thriemus

Senior member
Mar 2, 2005
215
0
0
Super Pi SSE2 Patched to 2M places: 1:19 Sec


Tomorrow I might try running the memory through a divider and tightening up the timings a bit to see how that affects my time. Time to push these 1gb babies to the max!
 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
hmm.... i sitll think we should use that version i posted...

even at 2M people are going to get the same time...
Click to expand...


Problem is it must not be SSE2 patched as I get 2 seconds slower or the same as my non SSE2 superpi app I have had for like 1-1/2 years....
 
S

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
well...

if we all agree not to use the non-patched version... idon't see what the problem is :)

on the nonpatched version, i can get 1:09

well... we're gonna see a ton of ties IMHO...

so far 2 or 3 people have 1:11/1:12
 
K

kini62

Senior member
Jan 31, 2005
254
0
0
2M Patched 1:19
2M mod1.4 non patched 1:28.172

Shouldn't we just post the best time regardless of whether it's patched or not. Everyone has access to the patched version if they want.
 
T

thriemus

Senior member
Mar 2, 2005
215
0
0
Nice one, the thing holding my score back is running memory at 2T. I cant seem to get these stick running at 1T and if I do its at a really low speed so i am better off using 480 mhz at 2t. But then again I have 2gb so....
 
S

Sentential

Senior member
Feb 28, 2005
677
0
0
Not even trying. Tons of stuff in the backround including many Torrents.

1MB = 31 secs
2MB = 1:11
 
W

WolveBane

Member
Nov 17, 2004
30
0
0
Originally posted by: Sentential
Not even trying. Tons of stuff in the backround including many Torrents.

1MB = 31 secs
2MB = 1:11
Click to expand...

Soo-wheat score!

But, be a little hush about it... we don't wanna wake the sleeping monsters, now do we? [AMD64 FX-55];)
 
S

Sentential

Senior member
Feb 28, 2005
677
0
0
Originally posted by: WolveBane
Originally posted by: Sentential
Not even trying. Tons of stuff in the backround including many Torrents.

1MB = 31 secs
2MB = 1:11
Click to expand...

Soo-wheat score!

But, be a little hush about it... we don't wanna wake the sleeping monsters, now do we? [AMD64 FX-55];)
Click to expand...

FX55 aint got nothing on me. This is a 6xx @ mid 4.1 with the patch. It will take an aweful lot to take my bench scores down <when I do them>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom