Suit filed says criminal investigation into Attorney General Jeff Sessions should happen

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,391
5,004
136
lol, of course I shouldn't have. There is no need to know why Sessions chose to have that meeting in his office. We DO know that he deceived the Senate about it, however, which is the whole point.

My last word on the subject, Context Matters. Obviously you will ignore it because it is about a Republican. With Hillary it is all OK regardless of what she lies about or the laws she has broken.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,156
55,707
136
It is her server. She is responsible for everything that happens to it.

Irrelevant. You said she was aware those emails were on it, not that she was responsible for its contents. Those are two entirely different claims.

She knew that the e-mails were on the server and made the false claim that they were no longer.

Please provide literally any evidence for this claim or apologize.

She also gave the server access to a private firm to delete said e-mails.

First you said she deleted them, now you're saying a private firm deleted them. You can't even keep your own lies straight. If you have any evidence she deleted those emails or, knowing they were work related directed that private firm to delete them please present it. If not, please provide a second apology for this lie as well.

All of this was shown during the investigation. The administration blew it off as she had no intent ...

All of this is public knowledge.

No apology due or coming from me.

So basically you've admitted twice that you have no evidence for the claims you made and yet you accused her of blatantly lying under oath. It turns out we have in fact outed a liar here but it's you and your double standard between Sessions and Clinton is hilarious. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,156
55,707
136
My last word on the subject, Context Matters. Obviously you will ignore it because it is about a Republican. With Hillary it is all OK regardless of what she lies about or the laws she has broken.

So your argument is 'It should be assumed that Sessions had no bad intentions at that meeting or his false statements under oath because the meeting took place in his private Senate office.'

That is the weakest and dumbest excuse I have heard in a very long time.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,674
17,281
136
So your argument is 'It should be assumed that Sessions had no bad intentions at that meeting or his false statements under oath because the meeting took place in his private Senate office.'

That is the weakest and dumbest excuse I have heard in a very long time.


Well, you are talking to a lying idiot.


What's odd is that he has no problem making up reasons why sessions would lie but when it's known that Hillary gave her emails and server to get lawyers to go through them, in order to remain impartial, means she lied when she turned everything over.
 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
What are you talking about? The Democrats have a long track record with Russia and China.

Pretty sure even someone like you can figure out that Trump's relationship with Putin differs from the democrats', albeit low integrity and loyalty to the cause prevents admission of this.
 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
If you were going to have a secret meeting with an ambassador from Russia would you do it in your office where everyone could see it?

Probably because conservatives know that no matter what* their kind will always blindly carry water for their own. *Eg. play too dumb to figure how a phone works, advocate for genocide, or shoot someone in the middle of the street.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
My last word on the subject, Context Matters. Obviously you will ignore it because it is about a Republican. With Hillary it is all OK regardless of what she lies about or the laws she has broken.
"Last Word" pure hilarity. My husband tries that on me, it goes terribly for him.

Fact remains, Hilary was investigated, you don't like the conclusions drawn. Sessions should be investigated. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, yes? Hey, maybe your fondest belief will prove correct and your Republican guy won't be found guilty of anything. Won't change the fact he's a horrendously heinous individual and not because he's Republican. But if he is found guilty I hope his next roommates name is Gentle Ben.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kage69

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
lol, of course I shouldn't have. There is no need to know why Sessions chose to have that meeting in his office. We DO know that he deceived the Senate about it, however, which is the whole point.

He deceived the Senate about a meeting that took place in his Senate office? What? Did Sessions sneak the guys in through the backdoor?
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
He deceived the Senate about a meeting that took place in his Senate office? What? Did Sessions sneak the guys in through the backdoor?
He possibly had conversations he had no business having with a Russian Agent. It's not that he had meetings, it's the content of those meetings in question, add to that his answer during his Confirmation hearing at minimum puts him in a tough spot. The suspicion is warranted by his own words that revealed themselves to be false or purposely obtuse. If he had answered the question that was on the table he may have saved himself this trouble. He has no one to blame but himself for the need to follow his words to wherever they may go. Fingers crossed the pig is removed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kage69

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,156
55,707
136
He deceived the Senate about a meeting that took place in his Senate office? What? Did Sessions sneak the guys in through the backdoor?

Are you saying that senators are aware of all meetings that each other have and who they are with? What is this based on?

If you have information that says that senators were aware of this meeting then please present it. Take as much time as you need.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,657
48,386
136
"Last Word" pure hilarity. My husband tries that on me, it goes terribly for him.

Fact remains, Hilary was investigated, you don't like the conclusions drawn. Sessions should be investigated. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, yes?
Hey, maybe your fondest belief will prove correct and your Republican guy won't be found guilty of anything. Won't change the fact he's a horrendously heinous individual and not because he's Republican. But if he is found guilty I hope his next roommates name is Gentle Ben.

I feel this really can't be stated enough. C'mon repubs, nut up. Let the trash fall where it may and arise a cleaner entity, one hopefully with better priorities.

Or I guess they can hang onto that orange turd while he circles the drain some more. Whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Younigue

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Not 100% accurate but close enough

C7m9AzDXUAQQOS2.jpg
I tried making this into a drinking game, but didn't want to become an alcoholic.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
He deceived the Senate about a meeting that took place in his Senate office? What? Did Sessions sneak the guys in through the backdoor?

It's not like Kislyak wears a sign that says "Russian Ambassador". He's indistinguishable from all the other people in the building unless you know who he is-

220px-Sergey_Ivanovich_Kislyak_2016.jpg